Contributing to Mastodon Glitch Edition
Thank you for your interest in contributing to the
Here are some guidelines, and ways you can help.
(This document is a bit of a work-in-progress, so please bear with us. If you don't see what you're looking for here, please don't hesitate to reach out!)
Right now a lot of the planning for this project takes place in our development Discord, or through GitHub Issues and Projects. We're working on ways to improve the planning structure and better solicit feedback, and if you feel like you can help in this respect, feel free to give us a holler.
The documentation for this repository is available at
glitch-soc/docs (online at glitch-soc.github.io/docs/).
Right now, we've mostly focused on the features that make this fork different from upstream in some manner.
Adding screenshots, improving descriptions, and so forth are all ways to help contribute to the project even if you don't know any code.
Check out the documentation here for more information.
See the guidelines below.
You should also try to follow the guidelines set out in the original
tootsuite/mastodon, reproduced below.
Thank you for considering contributing to Mastodon
You can contribute in the following ways:
- Finding and reporting bugs
- Translating the Mastodon interface into various languages
- Contributing code to Mastodon by fixing bugs or implementing features
- Improving the documentation
If your contributions are accepted into Mastodon, you can request to be paid through our OpenCollective.
Bug reports and feature suggestions must use descriptive and concise titles and be submitted to GitHub Issues. Please use the search function to make sure that you are not submitting duplicates, and that a similar report or request has not already been resolved or rejected.
You can submit translations via Crowdin. They are periodically merged into the codebase.
Please use clean, concise titles for your pull requests. We use commit squashing, so the final commit in the master branch will carry the title of the pull request.
The smaller the set of changes in the pull request is, the quicker it can be reviewed and merged. Splitting tasks into multiple smaller pull requests is often preferable.
Pull requests that do not pass automated checks may not be reviewed. In particular, you need to keep in mind:
- Unit and integration tests (rspec, jest)
- Code style rules (rubocop, eslint)
- Normalization of locale files (i18n-tasks)