Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update strk.kbt.io/projects/go/libravatar to latest #8429

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Oct 8, 2019

Conversation

@guillep2k
Copy link
Member

commented Oct 8, 2019

Closes #7860

This version adds a mutex to serialize access to the gravatar cache.

@lafriks
lafriks approved these changes Oct 8, 2019
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 label Oct 8, 2019
@lafriks lafriks added kind/bug and removed lgtm/need 1 labels Oct 8, 2019
@lafriks lafriks modified the milestones: 1.9.5, 1.10.0 Oct 8, 2019
@codecov-io

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Oct 8, 2019

Codecov Report

❗️ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@4fe04f1). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #8429   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage          ?   41.8%           
========================================
  Files             ?     497           
  Lines             ?   65631           
  Branches          ?       0           
========================================
  Hits              ?   27440           
  Misses            ?   34676           
  Partials          ?    3515

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4fe04f1...ddceaa1. Read the comment docs.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done and removed lgtm/need 1 labels Oct 8, 2019
@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit f05a335 into go-gitea:master Oct 8, 2019
1 check was pending
1 check was pending
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is running
Details
@lunny

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Oct 9, 2019

@techknowlogick why removed the back port label? It seems #7860 is in v1.9.5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
6 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.