New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with init of content in page resources #4664

Closed
bep opened this Issue Apr 23, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@bep
Member

bep commented Apr 23, 2018

Related to the update in 0.40. A corner case. It hit me, and I'm not sure what's happening. It's related to shortcodes. Will investigate and fix.

@bep bep added the Bug label Apr 23, 2018

@bep bep added this to the 0.40.1 milestone Apr 23, 2018

@bep bep self-assigned this Apr 23, 2018

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

bep added a commit to bep/hugo that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2018

hugolib: Fix some shortcode vs .Content corner cases
This is a follow-up to gohugoio#4632. There were some assumptions in that implementation that did not hold water in all situations.

This commit simplifies the content lazy initalization making it more robust.

Fixes gohugoio#4664

@bep bep closed this in #4667 Apr 25, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment