Please sign in to comment.
spec: remove example explaining that type B0 and B0 are identical
Every few months we get a new error report claiming that there is a typo in the spec related to this specific example. Clearly, the fact that two types with the same identifier are identical seems exceedingly obvious to readers; thus the example seems not worth the trouble. Removing it. For #9226. For #22202. For #22495. For #23096. For #23409. There may be more. Change-Id: I003ba79dc460ffb028a4ecb5f29efd60f2551912 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/87417 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <email@example.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <firstname.lastname@example.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <email@example.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Loading branch information...