You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since CL 21504, TestTRun is failing on the plan9/arm builder.
--- FAIL: TestTRun (0.06s)
sub_test.go:373: failnow skips future sequential and parallel tests at same level:ouput:
got:
--- FAIL: failnow skips future sequential and parallel tests at same level (0.01s)
--- FAIL: failnow skips future sequential and parallel tests at same level/#00 (0.00s)
want:
--- FAIL: failnow skips future sequential and parallel tests at same level (0.00s)
--- FAIL: failnow skips future sequential and parallel tests at same level/#00 (0.00s)
FAIL
FAIL testing 3.440s
The plan9/arm builder is running on a Raspberry Pi 3, which is a slow machine. The output comparison is failing because the test executes slightly slower than expected.
Perhaps we should ignore the time when comparing the string. What do you think?
Perhaps we should ignore the time when comparing the string. What do you think?
Yes, either sanitizeLog could remove the duration (N.NNs) from the end of lines, or the comparison between want: and got: could be done as a regular expression match (and sanitizeLog would not be needed).
Since CL 21504, TestTRun is failing on the plan9/arm builder.
See http://build.golang.org/log/41d221b5accf16216bb6d9f1a767cbfff7c8e6f1
The plan9/arm builder is running on a Raspberry Pi 3, which is a slow machine. The output comparison is failing because the test executes slightly slower than expected.
Perhaps we should ignore the time when comparing the string. What do you think?
CC: @mpvl @bradfitz @millerresearch
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: