Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

net/http: MethodPatch references the wrong RFC #15546

Closed
dmaze opened this issue May 4, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@dmaze
Copy link

commented May 4, 2016

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

  1. What version of Go are you using (go version)?

go version go1.6.2 darwin/amd64

  1. What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env)?
GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN=""
GOEXE=""
GOHOSTARCH="amd64"
GOHOSTOS="darwin"
GOOS="darwin"
GOPATH="/Users/dmaze/Diffeo/go"
GORACE=""
GOROOT="/usr/local/Cellar/go/1.6.2/libexec"
GOTOOLDIR="/usr/local/Cellar/go/1.6.2/libexec/pkg/tool/darwin_amd64"
GO15VENDOREXPERIMENT="1"
CC="clang"
GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fno-caret-diagnostics -Qunused-arguments -fmessage-length=0 -fno-common"
CXX="clang++"
CGO_ENABLED="1"
  1. What did you do?

Run godoc net/http MethodPatch; or visited https://godoc.org/net/http#MethodPatch or http://localhost:6060/pkg/net/http#MethodPatch.

  1. What did you expect to see?

A reference to RFC 5789, "PATCH Method for HTTP".

  1. What did you see instead?

A reference to RFC 5741, "RFC Streams, Headers, and Boilerplates", the meta-RFC that defines the format of RFCs.

@bradfitz bradfitz added this to the Go1.7 milestone May 4, 2016

@bradfitz bradfitz changed the title net/http.MethodPatch references the wrong RFC net/http: MethodPatch references the wrong RFC May 4, 2016

@gopherbot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented May 4, 2016

CL https://golang.org/cl/22773 mentions this issue.

@gopherbot gopherbot closed this in bfcb5b6 May 4, 2016

@golang golang locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2017

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
You can’t perform that action at this time.