net/http: parameterized Routes in Handle

[AyushG3112]

This is a feature request and not a bug.

As is a basic requirement during path matching, can defining a path parameter be allowed in http.Handle and getting the value of the passed parameter in the request as a map[string]string be allowed?

[mvdan]

As far as I know, http.ServeMux is a simple router and should stay that way. If you want more advanced features, there are a ton of routers out there that you can use, such as https://github.com/go-chi/chi and https://github.com/gorilla/mux.

[AyushG3112]

I would agree if this was a use case which is not encountered often enough. While I can use 3rd party routers, they do a lot more stuff under the wraps, causing some overhead. I would prefer not to go through that if possible.

Although if you or anyone could provide a router/Mux with comparable runtime performance, I would appreciate that too

[mvdan]

A feature that seems fundamental to one may seem useless to another. You can't have a router that is both useful and free of bloat to everyone's standards.

Have you measured performance on third-party routers to be orders of magnitude slower than that of ServeMux? I would be surprised if it were the case, or if it even mattered in most use cases. I also suspect that the introduction of path arguments and maps would incur extra work and a slow-down no matter what.

As said before, I don't know where the line is drawn for ServeMux. I'm simply trying to point out that adding more features can be a slippery slope, and you already have good alternatives elsewhere.

[bradfitz]

Sorry, http.ServeMux's feature set is frozen, at least for Go 1.

I'll leave this open to consider for later.

[xgfone]

I hope to add this feature in Go2.

If the std library supplies it, I don't need to import the third-party router.

[tj]

A router in stdlib would be sweet IMHO, they're honestly all pretty much the same, barring internal performance differences etc, but I guess it's not hard to make a case for "just use a third-party router" either :D.

[ofabricio]

You think a simple util would help?

http.HandleFunc("/users/", func (w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    a := r.VarPath(0) // given "/users/123/something", a == "users"
    b := r.VarPath(1) // given "/users/123/something", b == "123"
    c := r.VarPath(2) // given "/users/123/something", c == "something"
})

At least you can manually check the value inside a handler and call another handler, and everything continues simple.

[audrenbdb]

It's pretty much the only thing that stops me and my team from using the default mux.

Sure chi is fine, but it's stil la third-party to rely on.

[seankhliao]

see #60227 for the current discussions

[ianlancetaylor]

Closing in favor of #60227.