Skip to content

cmd/pprof: discrepency between pprof list and weblist #27473

@ardan-bkennedy

Description

@ardan-bkennedy

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

What version of Go are you using (go version)?

go version go1.11 darwin/amd64

Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?

YES

What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env)?

GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN=""
GOCACHE="/Users/bill/Library/Caches/go-build"
GOEXE=""
GOFLAGS=""
GOHOSTARCH="amd64"
GOHOSTOS="darwin"
GOOS="darwin"
GOPATH="/Users/bill/code/go"
GOPROXY=""
GORACE=""
GOROOT="/usr/local/go"
GOTMPDIR=""
GOTOOLDIR="/usr/local/go/pkg/tool/darwin_amd64"
GCCGO="gccgo"
CC="clang"
CXX="clang++"
CGO_ENABLED="1"
GOMOD=""
CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_CPPFLAGS=""
CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_LDFLAGS="-g -O2"
PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config"
GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fno-caret-diagnostics -Qunused-arguments -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/var/folders/p6/l5y36lvx3zvdc3gtfh0g_43w0000gn/T/go-build393058492=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches -fno-common"

What did you do?

Using this code:
https://github.com/ardanlabs/gotraining/tree/master/topics/go/profiling/memcpu

I ran this set of commands:

$ go test -gcflags "-m -m" -run none -bench . -benchtime 3s -benchmem -memprofile p.out  
$ go tool pprof p.out  
(pprof) weblist algOne  

What did you expect to see?

I saw the weblist view was different (and more accurate) then the list view

weblist view

Type: alloc_space
Time: Sep 3, 2018 at 10:39am (PDT)
Total: 325.53MB
github.com/ardanlabs/gotraining/topics/go/profiling/memcpu.algOne
/Users/bill/code/go/src/github.com/ardanlabs/gotraining/topics/go/profiling/memcpu/stream.go

  Total:    325.53MB   325.53MB (flat, cum)   100%
     78            .          .            
     79            .          .           // algOne is one way to solve the problem. 
     80            .          .           func algOne(data []byte, find []byte, repl []byte, output *bytes.Buffer) { 
     81            .          .            
     82            .          .           	// Use a bytes Buffer to provide a stream to process. 
     83     311.03MB   311.03MB           	input := bytes.NewBuffer(data) 
     84            .          .            
     85            .          .           	// The number of bytes we are looking for. 
     86            .          .           	size := len(find) 
     87            .          .            
     88            .          .           	// Declare the buffers we need to process the stream. 
     89      14.50MB    14.50MB           	buf := make([]byte, size) 
     90            .          .           	end := size - 1 
     91            .          .            
     92            .          .           	// Read in an initial number of bytes we need to get started. 
     93            .          .           	if n, err := io.ReadFull(input, buf[:end]); err != nil { 
     94            .          .           		output.Write(buf[:n]) 

list view .

ROUTINE ======================== github.com/ardanlabs/gotraining/topics/go/profiling/memcpu.algOne in /Users/bill/code/go/src/github.com/ardanlabs/gotraining/topics/go/profiling/memcpu/stream.go
   14.50MB   325.53MB (flat, cum)   100% of Total
         .          .     78:
         .          .     79:// algOne is one way to solve the problem.
         .          .     80:func algOne(data []byte, find []byte, repl []byte, output *bytes.Buffer) {
         .          .     81:
         .          .     82:	// Use a bytes Buffer to provide a stream to process.
         .   311.03MB     83:	input := bytes.NewBuffer(data)
         .          .     84:
         .          .     85:	// The number of bytes we are looking for.
         .          .     86:	size := len(find)
         .          .     87:
         .          .     88:	// Declare the buffers we need to process the stream.
   14.50MB    14.50MB     89:	buf := make([]byte, size)
         .          .     90:	end := size - 1

What did you see instead?

Notice the weblist view is showing the allocation is flat, which is correct since the call to NewBuffer is inlined. Maybe more important the views are different. Please keep the allocation flat on the report, because it is more accurate with what the compiler chose to do.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    FrozenDueToAgeNeedsInvestigationSomeone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions