Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testing: Test-case name convention #30599

cn007b opened this Issue Mar 5, 2019 · 2 comments


None yet
4 participants
Copy link

commented Mar 5, 2019

Does it make sense to have some kind of convention to name test-cases like this: Test_{StructName}_{MethodName} for struct's methods and Test_{FuncName} for regular functions, so now it's simple to figure out method/function and navigate this test-case through project.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Mar 5, 2019

Are you asking a question? If so, see

If you're suggesting a documentation change somewhere, please clarify what you're proposing.

@cn007b cn007b closed this Mar 6, 2019

@cn007b cn007b reopened this Mar 6, 2019


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Apr 6, 2019

Timed out in state WaitingForInfo. Closing.

(I am just a bot, though. Please speak up if this is a mistake or you have the requested information.)

@gopherbot gopherbot closed this Apr 6, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.