CL 166717 caused a regression in benchmark ns/op printing precision.
We now get benchmark output like:
BenchmarkFast-8 380491575 3.00 ns/op
Previously, we got:
BenchmarkFast-8 380491575 3.12 ns/op
This is due to a change in BenchmarkResult.String. Previously, when ns/op was small, it recalculated it to get extra precision and had special print handling. Now it always uses the results of BenchmarkResult.NsPerOp, which returns an int64.
cc @aclements