New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
proposal: review meeting minutes #33502
Comments
2019-08-06 / @rsc, @griesemer, @andybons
|
2019-08-13 / @rsc, @griesemer, @andybons, @spf13
|
2019-08-20 / @rsc, @griesemer, @andybons, @ianlancetaylor
|
2019-08-27 / @rsc, @bradfitz, @spf13, @andybons, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor
|
2019-09-03 / @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @spf13
|
2019-09-12 / @rsc, @bradfitz, @andybons, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor
|
2019-09-18 / @rsc, @bradfitz, @andybons, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @spf13
|
2019-09-25 / @rsc, @bradfitz, @sfrancia, @andybons
|
2019-10-02 / @rsc, @bradfitz, @ianlancetaylor, @andybons
|
2019-10-09 / @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @rsc Proposals
Issues with NeedsDecision label
|
2019-10-16 / @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor
|
2019-10-16 / @bradfitz, @griesemer
|
2019-10-30 / @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @rsc, @spf13 Proposals
Issues with NeedsDecision label
|
2019-11-06 / @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @rsc
|
2019-11-13 / @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @rsc
|
2019-11-20 / @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @rsc
|
2019-11-27 / @ianlancetaylor, @rsc
|
2019-12-04 / @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @rsc, @spf13
|
2019-12-11 / @rsc, @ianlancetaylor, @griesemer, @bradfitz
|
2020-01-08 / @rsc, @ianlancetaylor, @griesemer, @bradfitz, @andybons
|
2020-01-15 / @rsc, @ianlancetaylor, @griesemer, @bradfitz, @spf13
|
2020-01-22 / @rsc, @ianlancetaylor, @griesemer, @bradfitz, @spf13
|
2020-02-05 / @rsc, @ianlancetaylor, @griesemer, @andybons
|
2020-02-12 / @rsc, @bradfitz, @andybons
|
2020-02-26 / @rsc, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @bradfitz, @andybons
|
2020-03-04 / @rsc, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @bradfitz, @spf13
|
2023-01-18 / @aclements, @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
Hold
|
2023-01-25 / @aclements, @adonovan, @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
|
2023-02-01 / @aclements, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
Hold
Other
|
2023-02-08 / @aclements, @adonovan, @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc [We didn't get to everything today due to long discussions about a few of the proposals we did get to. Also, people following proposals may be interested in this discussion (not proposal): telemetry in the Go toolchain #58409.] Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
|
[Lost last week due to covid. Didn't get through everything this week.] 2023-02-22 / @aclements, @adonovan, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
|
2023-03-01 / @adonovan, @andybons, @bradfitz, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
|
2023-03-08 / @aclements, @adonovan, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
Hold
|
2023-03-15 / @aclements, @adonovan, @andybons, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
|
2023-03-29 / @adonovan, @griesemer, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
|
2023-04-05 / @adonovan, @ianlancetaylor, @julieqiu, @rsc Accepted
Declined
Likely Accept
Likely Decline
Active
|
The proposal review group meets regularly (roughly weekly) to review pending proposal issues and move them along in the proposal process.
Review consists primarily of checking that discussion is ongoing, commenting on issues to move discussion along, summarizing long discussions, CC’ing experts, and accepting or closing proposals when the discussion on the GitHub issue has reached a clear consensus about the outcome.
Review also includes closing proposals that are untenable (for example, because the changes are backwards-incompatible or violate key design goals of the language or packages).
This meta-issue records minutes of the proposal review meetings as issue comments, so that they can be cross-linked easily with the relevant issues. (This meta-issue is for minutes only; comments that are not meeting minutes will be deleted.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: