Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/tools/gopls: improve completion for variadic params #34334

muirrn opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 1 comment


Copy link

commented Sep 16, 2019

In cases like this:

foo := func(...string) {}
var myStr string
foo("hi", <>)

we should prefer "myStr" since we know we are completing an individual string.

Also, we should add "..." to variadic completion items:

foo := func(...string) {}
var myStrs []string
foo(mySt<>) // complete to "myStrs..." instead of just "myStrs"

Consider whether we should do it for cases like this:

foo := func(...interface{}) {}
var myIntf []interface{}
foo(myIn<>) // should this complete to "myIntf..." or just "myIntf"?

Personally I think it should still expand in this case to myIntf... because that is more likely what you want vs passing the []interface{} as the first variadic interface{}.

@gopherbot gopherbot added this to the Unreleased milestone Sep 16, 2019

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Sep 16, 2019

Thank you for filing a gopls issue! Please take a look at the Troubleshooting section of the gopls Wiki page, and make sure that you have provided all of the relevant information here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.