I recently sent a series of CLs (ending with https://golang.org/cl/232742) to fix a gollvm bug, #38728.
Gopherbot noticed the CLs as they were put up, adding "mentioned" notices to the issue:
Change https://golang.org/cl/232742 mentions this issue: gollvm: add workaround for hard-wired cf-protection=branch
however when the CLs were merged, it didn't take any actions. In particular the bot didn't annotate the issue with the merge, and didn't auto-close the bug.
Wondering if there is something I did wrong with the CLs (I used the usual "Updates/Fixes" notation), or if there is something else gumming up the works?
Any pointers appreciated. Thanks.
I recently sent a series of CLs (ending with https://golang.org/cl/232742) to fix a gollvm bug, #38728.
Gopherbot noticed the CLs as they were put up, adding "mentioned" notices to the issue:
Change https://golang.org/cl/232742 mentions this issue: gollvm: add workaround for hard-wired cf-protection=branchhowever when the CLs were merged, it didn't take any actions. In particular the bot didn't annotate the issue with the merge, and didn't auto-close the bug.
Wondering if there is something I did wrong with the CLs (I used the usual "Updates/Fixes" notation), or if there is something else gumming up the works?
Any pointers appreciated. Thanks.