Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/build: linux-riscv64-unleashed builder is missing #41956

Closed
dmitshur opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 14 comments
Closed

x/build: linux-riscv64-unleashed builder is missing #41956

dmitshur opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 14 comments

Comments

@dmitshur
Copy link
Contributor

@dmitshur dmitshur commented Oct 13, 2020

From https://farmer.golang.org/:

host-linux-riscv64-unleashed: 0/0 (1 missing)

@bradfitz Are you able to get this builder up and running again? Does it just need to be restarted, or is there more work to do? Thank you.

CC @4a6f656c, @cagedmantis, @toothrot, just FYI.

@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

@bradfitz bradfitz commented Oct 14, 2020

No power loss or moves recently but it stopped pinging. I'll try power cycling it.

@mengzhuo
Copy link
Contributor

@mengzhuo mengzhuo commented Jun 3, 2021

@bradfitz This builder is still missing. I have one RISCV SBC, maybe we can use my builder.

@mengzhuo
Copy link
Contributor

@mengzhuo mengzhuo commented Jun 9, 2021

Ping @bcmills

@mengzhuo
Copy link
Contributor

@mengzhuo mengzhuo commented Jun 14, 2021

@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

@bradfitz bradfitz commented Jun 14, 2021

Sorry, I'll take a look.

@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

@bradfitz bradfitz commented Jun 14, 2021

It's back now.

@dmitshur, you still have root on it. I emailed you details.

@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

@bradfitz bradfitz commented Jun 14, 2021

What I hadn't noticed back in Oct 14, 2020 when power cycling it was that it wasn't configured to start on boot. It is now.

@dmitshur
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dmitshur dmitshur commented Jun 14, 2021

Thank you @bradfitz. I can see it's connected and running builds now, so closing as resolved.

@mengzhuo Would you like to proceed with your builder request, or do you think it's no longer needed given the current linux-riscv64-unleashed builder is back?

@mengzhuo
Copy link
Contributor

@mengzhuo mengzhuo commented Jun 15, 2021

Thank you @bradfitz. I can see it's connected and running builds now, so closing as resolved.

@mengzhuo Would you like to proceed with your builder request, or do you think it's no longer needed given the current linux-riscv64-unleashed builder is back?

@dmitris
I'm glad to continue the builder request for linux-riscv64-unmatched (not unleashed) if go team needs it.

@cagedmantis
Copy link
Contributor

@cagedmantis cagedmantis commented Jun 17, 2021

@mengzhuo I'm moving this conversation to an email thread as we discuss this further.

@4a6f656c
Copy link
Contributor

@4a6f656c 4a6f656c commented Jun 19, 2021

@dmitshur @bradfitz seems linux-riscv64-unleashed is MIA again - host-linux-riscv64-unleashed: 0/0 (1 missing) - given the discussion on #46804, perhaps we should just turn this off?

@bradfitz
Copy link
Contributor

@bradfitz bradfitz commented Jun 19, 2021

It wasn't pinging so I power cycled it and it came back, connected and doing builds.

Physical hardware is annoying. I have a network PDU with outlets I can control. Maybe I can rig up some watchdog.

@mengzhuo
Copy link
Contributor

@mengzhuo mengzhuo commented Jun 22, 2021

Maybe we can merge Unleashed builders in one host pool by keeping host-linux-riscv64-unleashed and remove host-linux-riscv64-jsing. I think 2 builders can speed up build and trybot.

@mengzhuo
Copy link
Contributor

@mengzhuo mengzhuo commented Jul 12, 2021

FYI: I can't run slow-bot on riscv64 while both of riscv64 builders are offline now.

host-linux-riscv64-joelsing: 0/0 (1 missing)
host-linux-riscv64-unleashed: 0/0 (1 missing)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
5 participants