You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Consider whether gopls should include full expressions in candidate labels. For example:
varfoofunc() intvarbar*intvar_int=<>
At <> we currently offer candidates with labels foo and bar (as of https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/323449), but they are inserted as foo() and *bar. We could change their labels to foo() and *bar, respectively.
There will be lots of test fallout from this change. We should consider changing the mark based completion tests to depend less directly on the candidate labels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
gopherbot
added
Tools
This label describes issues relating to any tools in the x/tools repository.
gopls
Issues related to the Go language server, gopls.
labels
Jun 9, 2021
Consider whether gopls should include full expressions in candidate labels. For example:
At
<>
we currently offer candidates with labelsfoo
andbar
(as of https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/323449), but they are inserted asfoo()
and*bar
. We could change their labels tofoo()
and*bar
, respectively.There will be lots of test fallout from this change. We should consider changing the mark based completion tests to depend less directly on the candidate labels.
/cc @findleyr
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: