Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

net: TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource failures #55197

Closed
gopherbot opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed

net: TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource failures #55197

gopherbot opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 10 comments
Labels
NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.

Comments

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

gopherbot commented Sep 20, 2022

#!watchflakes
post <- pkg == "net" && test == "TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource" && date < "2023-07-01"

Bug automatically created to track these flakes.

— watchflakes

@gopherbot gopherbot added the NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. label Sep 20, 2022
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

gopherbot commented Sep 20, 2022

Found new matching flaky dashboard failures for:

#!watchflakes
post <- pkg == "net" && test == "TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource"
2022-08-08 17:36 openbsd-386-70 go@c2a9c558 net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
--- FAIL: TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (0.18s)
    lookup_test.go:663: LookupAddr(8.8.8.8): lookup 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa. on 169.254.169.254:53: server misbehaving (mode=go)

watchflakes

@rsc
Copy link
Contributor

rsc commented Sep 20, 2022

Stopped.

@rsc rsc closed this as completed Sep 20, 2022
@gopherbot gopherbot changed the title net: flaky TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource net: TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource failures Sep 20, 2022
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found new dashboard test flakes for:

#!watchflakes
post <- pkg == "net" && test == "TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource"
2023-04-12 20:54 linux-amd64-longtest-race go@f58c6ccc net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
--- FAIL: TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (10.49s)
    lookup_test.go:666: LookupAddr(8.8.8.8): lookup 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa. on 169.254.169.254:53: server misbehaving (mode=go)
    lookup_test.go:666: LookupAddr(8.8.8.8): lookup 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa. on 169.254.169.254:53: server misbehaving (mode=cgo)
2023/04/12 21:27:45 killing splice client after 5 second shutdown timeout
2023-05-10 22:43 freebsd-amd64-12_3 go@639957eb net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x8009f9f1c m=0 sigcode=1
signal arrived during cgo execution

rax    0xc2c3
rbx    0x437e
rcx    0xc2c3
rdx    0xffffffffffffffff
rdi    0x0
rsi    0x0
...
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_unix.go:96 +0xa5 fp=0xc00032bd98 sp=0xc00032bd38 pc=0x561325
net.(*Resolver).LookupCNAME(0xc000392310?, {0x6dcc10?, 0x879980?}, {0x685212, 0xb})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:472 +0x2b fp=0xc00032bde0 sp=0xc00032bd98 pc=0x55deeb
net.LookupCNAME(...)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:455
net.testDots(0xc0001df380, {0x682ee0, 0x3})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:676 +0x12e fp=0xc00032bef0 sp=0xc00032bde0 pc=0x5b918e
net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource(0xc0001df380)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:658 +0x157 fp=0xc00032bf70 sp=0xc00032bef0 pc=0x5b8fb7
testing.tRunner(0xc0001df380, 0x699c48)

watchflakes

@gopherbot gopherbot reopened this May 11, 2023
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found new dashboard test flakes for:

#!watchflakes
post <- pkg == "net" && test == "TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource"
2023-05-22 16:48 freebsd-amd64-13_0 go@10fbd925 net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x800a115e1 m=0 sigcode=1
signal arrived during cgo execution

rax    0x1ffff8
rbx    0x8008621b0
rcx    0xffffffffffffffff
rdx    0x8008620c0
rdi    0xffffffffffffffff
rsi    0x800862280
...
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_unix.go:96 +0xa5 fp=0xc00023bd98 sp=0xc00023bd38 pc=0x563c85
net.(*Resolver).LookupCNAME(0xc000311cb0?, {0x6e3a90?, 0x883bc0?}, {0x68a838, 0xb})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:472 +0x2b fp=0xc00023bde0 sp=0xc00023bd98 pc=0x56082b
net.LookupCNAME(...)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:455
net.testDots(0xc00020cea0, {0x6884f3, 0x3})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:676 +0x12e fp=0xc00023bef0 sp=0xc00023bde0 pc=0x5bd08e
net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource(0xc00020cea0)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:658 +0x157 fp=0xc00023bf70 sp=0xc00023bef0 pc=0x5bceb7
testing.tRunner(0xc00020cea0, 0x69f4f0)

watchflakes

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found new dashboard test flakes for:

#!watchflakes
post <- pkg == "net" && test == "TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource"
2023-05-22 19:05 freebsd-amd64-13_0 go@6761bff4 net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x800a115e1 m=0 sigcode=1
signal arrived during cgo execution

rax    0x1ffff8
rbx    0x8008621b0
rcx    0xffffffffffffffff
rdx    0x8008620c0
rdi    0xffffffffffffffff
rsi    0x800862280
...
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_unix.go:96 +0xa5 fp=0xc0003abd98 sp=0xc0003abd38 pc=0x563c85
net.(*Resolver).LookupCNAME(0xc000358b10?, {0x6e3a90?, 0x883bc0?}, {0x68a838, 0xb})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:472 +0x2b fp=0xc0003abde0 sp=0xc0003abd98 pc=0x56082b
net.LookupCNAME(...)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:455
net.testDots(0xc0003689c0, {0x6884f3, 0x3})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:676 +0x12e fp=0xc0003abef0 sp=0xc0003abde0 pc=0x5bd08e
net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource(0xc0003689c0)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:658 +0x157 fp=0xc0003abf70 sp=0xc0003abef0 pc=0x5bceb7
testing.tRunner(0xc0003689c0, 0x69f4f0)
2023-05-22 19:37 freebsd-amd64-13_0 go@8c445b7c net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x800a115e1 m=0 sigcode=1
signal arrived during cgo execution

rax    0x1ffff8
rbx    0x8008621b0
rcx    0xffffffffffffffff
rdx    0x8008620c0
rdi    0xffffffffffffffff
rsi    0x800862280
...
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_unix.go:96 +0xa5 fp=0xc00023dd98 sp=0xc00023dd38 pc=0x563c85
net.(*Resolver).LookupCNAME(0xc000580dd0?, {0x6e3a90?, 0x883bc0?}, {0x68a838, 0xb})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:472 +0x2b fp=0xc00023dde0 sp=0xc00023dd98 pc=0x56082b
net.LookupCNAME(...)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:455
net.testDots(0xc0002b4ea0, {0x6884f3, 0x3})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:676 +0x12e fp=0xc00023def0 sp=0xc00023dde0 pc=0x5bd08e
net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource(0xc0002b4ea0)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:658 +0x157 fp=0xc00023df70 sp=0xc00023def0 pc=0x5bceb7
testing.tRunner(0xc0002b4ea0, 0x69f4f0)

watchflakes

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found new dashboard test flakes for:

#!watchflakes
post <- pkg == "net" && test == "TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource"
2023-05-23 11:36 freebsd-amd64-13_0 go@380529d5 net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x800a115e1 m=0 sigcode=1
signal arrived during cgo execution

rax    0x1ffff8
rbx    0x8008621b0
rcx    0xffffffffffffffff
rdx    0x8008620c0
rdi    0xffffffffffffffff
rsi    0x800862280
...
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_unix.go:96 +0xa5 fp=0xc0003d5d98 sp=0xc0003d5d38 pc=0x563c85
net.(*Resolver).LookupCNAME(0xc0000c87f0?, {0x6e3a90?, 0x883bc0?}, {0x68a838, 0xb})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:472 +0x2b fp=0xc0003d5de0 sp=0xc0003d5d98 pc=0x56082b
net.LookupCNAME(...)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:455
net.testDots(0xc000133a00, {0x6884f3, 0x3})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:676 +0x12e fp=0xc0003d5ef0 sp=0xc0003d5de0 pc=0x5bd08e
net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource(0xc000133a00)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:658 +0x157 fp=0xc0003d5f70 sp=0xc0003d5ef0 pc=0x5bceb7
testing.tRunner(0xc000133a00, 0x69f4f0)

watchflakes

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found new dashboard test flakes for:

#!watchflakes
post <- pkg == "net" && test == "TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource"
2023-05-23 16:36 freebsd-amd64-13_0 go@d9f7efed net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x800a115e1 m=0 sigcode=1
signal arrived during cgo execution

rax    0x1ffff8
rbx    0x8008621b0
rcx    0xffffffffffffffff
rdx    0x8008620c0
rdi    0xffffffffffffffff
rsi    0x800862280
...
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_unix.go:96 +0xa5 fp=0xc0000cfd98 sp=0xc0000cfd38 pc=0x563c85
net.(*Resolver).LookupCNAME(0xc00009c2b0?, {0x6e3a90?, 0x883bc0?}, {0x68a838, 0xb})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:472 +0x2b fp=0xc0000cfde0 sp=0xc0000cfd98 pc=0x56082b
net.LookupCNAME(...)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:455
net.testDots(0xc000596820, {0x6884f3, 0x3})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:676 +0x12e fp=0xc0000cfef0 sp=0xc0000cfde0 pc=0x5bd08e
net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource(0xc000596820)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:658 +0x157 fp=0xc0000cff70 sp=0xc0000cfef0 pc=0x5bceb7
testing.tRunner(0xc000596820, 0x69f4f0)

watchflakes

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found new dashboard test flakes for:

#!watchflakes
post <- pkg == "net" && test == "TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource"
2023-05-23 19:06 freebsd-amd64-13_0 go@ef2bb813 net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource (log)
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
PC=0x800a115e1 m=0 sigcode=1
signal arrived during cgo execution

rax    0x1ffff8
rbx    0x8008621b0
rcx    0xffffffffffffffff
rdx    0x8008620c0
rdi    0xffffffffffffffff
rsi    0x800862280
...
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_unix.go:96 +0xa5 fp=0xc00022bd98 sp=0xc00022bd38 pc=0x5640c5
net.(*Resolver).LookupCNAME(0xc000388f20?, {0x6e3b70?, 0x883bc0?}, {0x68a838, 0xb})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:472 +0x2b fp=0xc00022bde0 sp=0xc00022bd98 pc=0x560c6b
net.LookupCNAME(...)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup.go:455
net.testDots(0xc00039b860, {0x6884f3, 0x3})
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:676 +0x12e fp=0xc00022bef0 sp=0xc00022bde0 pc=0x5bd4ce
net.TestLookupDotsWithRemoteSource(0xc00039b860)
	/tmp/workdir/go/src/net/lookup_test.go:658 +0x157 fp=0xc00022bf70 sp=0xc00022bef0 pc=0x5bd2f7
testing.tRunner(0xc00039b860, 0x69f528)

watchflakes

@4a6f656c
Copy link
Contributor

This appears to largely be a duplicate of #27992

@bcmills
Copy link
Contributor

bcmills commented Jan 2, 2024

@4a6f656c, most of the recent ones are #60132. Really, though, watchflakes shouldn't be reopening these issues to begin with (#57632).

@bcmills bcmills closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants