-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cmd/compile/internal/ssa: failure of TestFmaHash #61192
Comments
That's strange. Can you add a What directory are you building in? Maybe that test is not picking up the right go instance. The Maybe unset your |
I don't have a I'm running another build with the change you requested. |
This is the log with the added printout.
PS: The failure looks the same using gcc 10.3.0 instead of 4.8.5 from CentOS Edit: Tried to use the summary thing for collapsible log output, but that triggers markdown parsing inside. Now back to simple backticks. |
This looks like it may be the problem.
Is your
Ok, I misunderstood your |
Oh, out of disk space … that's embarrassing that I didn't check that last and profound error. Will try next week with antother location. But … there's over 80G free. It's a shared filesystem, so that may have changed. But still, does the test need dozens of GiB? |
I'm not sure. |
Even with
The usage was 'only' around 1.5G max in the work directory and 1.2G in |
I'm having a go with go 1.21.1. After patching out fmahash test using
I get a similar failure in another test:
These spurious out-of-disk-space errors are getting worse? Is this a feature of the go compiler/linker? This is a local disk with 86G free space. This has to be enough to compile and test golang! A search for 'no space left on device' in the issues here indicates that my setup is not the only one suffering from this. I'm going to try and patch out the loopvar test, too. |
OK, I managed to build go-1.21.0 now with three sets of changes.
The third one is new. I get a complaint that the expected mtime does not match after the rewrite. The difference Anyhow, that is my current hack for 2 and 3:
It is telling that those skipped tests already had safeguards about them being expensive. Apparently |
What version of Go are you using (
go version
)?I am trying to build go 1.20.5 using a pre-built go 1.17.3 on a CentOS 7.9 system with Haswell CPUs.
Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
Well … I am trying to bootstrap to the latest release …
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (
go env
)?go env
OutputWhat did you do?
Basically
What did you expect to see?
A completed build with all tests passing.
What did you see instead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: