Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runtime: SIGSEGV in sweepone on darwin/amd64 #62165

Closed
gopherbot opened this issue Aug 20, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

runtime: SIGSEGV in sweepone on darwin/amd64 #62165

gopherbot opened this issue Aug 20, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
compiler/runtime Issues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime. NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.

Comments

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

gopherbot commented Aug 20, 2023

#!watchflakes
post <- goos == "darwin" && log ~ `panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference` && log ~ `^\s*runtime\.sigpanic.*\n\s+.*\n\s*runtime\.sweepone`

Issue created automatically to collect these failures.

Example (log):

panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x108 pc=0xab9995b]

goroutine 3 [running]:
panic({0xb2640c0?, 0xb652e40?})
	runtime/panic.go:774 +0x158 fp=0xc0004b6ec8 sp=0xc0004b6e18 pc=0xaba9398
runtime.panicmem(...)
	runtime/panic.go:261
runtime.sigpanic()
	runtime/signal_unix.go:862 +0x378 fp=0xc0004b6f28 sp=0xc0004b6ec8 pc=0xabc0fd8
runtime.sweepone()
	runtime/mgcsweep.go:361 +0x1b fp=0xc0004b6f78 sp=0xc0004b6f28 pc=0xab9995b
runtime.bgsweep(0x0?)
	runtime/mgcsweep.go:301 +0xff fp=0xc0004b6fc8 sp=0xc0004b6f78 pc=0xab997ff
runtime.gcenable.gowrap1()
	runtime/mgc.go:203 +0x25 fp=0xc0004b6fe0 sp=0xc0004b6fc8 pc=0xab8e6e5
runtime.goexit()
	runtime/asm_amd64.s:1650 +0x1 fp=0xc0004b6fe8 sp=0xc0004b6fe0 pc=0xabdff61
created by runtime.gcenable in goroutine 1
	runtime/mgc.go:203 +0x66

watchflakes

@gopherbot gopherbot added the NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. label Aug 20, 2023
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found new dashboard test flakes for:

#!watchflakes
default <- repo == "go" && section == "Testing packages." && test == ""
2023-08-19 23:35 darwin-amd64-12_0 go@0b6ea6bb (log)
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x108 pc=0xab9995b]

goroutine 3 [running]:
panic({0xb2640c0?, 0xb652e40?})
	runtime/panic.go:774 +0x158 fp=0xc0004b6ec8 sp=0xc0004b6e18 pc=0xaba9398
runtime.panicmem(...)
	runtime/panic.go:261
runtime.sigpanic()
	runtime/signal_unix.go:862 +0x378 fp=0xc0004b6f28 sp=0xc0004b6ec8 pc=0xabc0fd8
runtime.sweepone()
	runtime/mgcsweep.go:361 +0x1b fp=0xc0004b6f78 sp=0xc0004b6f28 pc=0xab9995b
runtime.bgsweep(0x0?)
	runtime/mgcsweep.go:301 +0xff fp=0xc0004b6fc8 sp=0xc0004b6f78 pc=0xab997ff
runtime.gcenable.gowrap1()
	runtime/mgc.go:203 +0x25 fp=0xc0004b6fe0 sp=0xc0004b6fc8 pc=0xab8e6e5
runtime.goexit()
	runtime/asm_amd64.s:1650 +0x1 fp=0xc0004b6fe8 sp=0xc0004b6fe0 pc=0xabdff61
created by runtime.gcenable in goroutine 1
	runtime/mgc.go:203 +0x66

watchflakes

@phanithlanh123

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@gopherbot

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@bcmills bcmills changed the title Testing packages.: unrecognized failures runtime: SIGSEGV in sweepone Aug 21, 2023
@bcmills bcmills added the compiler/runtime Issues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime. label Aug 21, 2023
@bcmills bcmills changed the title runtime: SIGSEGV in sweepone runtime: SIGSEGV in sweepone on darwin/amd64 Aug 21, 2023
@mknyszek mknyszek closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 30, 2023
@mknyszek
Copy link
Contributor

Deduplicated with #60449.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler/runtime Issues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime. NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants