-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
all: binaries too big and growing #6853
Comments
Just for added reference, this are the size on go 1.1.2 vs 1.2 with OS X 10.9 and Xcode 5 (darwin gcc llvm 5.0 x86_64): $ ls -l *1.* -rwxr-xr-x 1 j staff 1525984 2 Dez 21:44 hello_1.1.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 j staff 2192672 2 Dez 21:40 hello_1.2 $ size *1.* __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex 1064960 94720 0 76000 1235680 12dae0 hello_1.1.2 1433600 147896 0 177440 1758936 1ad6d8 hello_1.2 |
This issue was updated by revision f238049. R=golang-dev, rsc CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/35940047 |
In this context, please reevaluate if the golang binaries can be changed to work with UPX (ultimate packer for executables).¹² For a small amount of computing power, upx can reduce the size of a binary down to a quarter of its original size. You can authenticate this using a existing example ›fixer‹ programm for golang binaries on linux/amd64.³ While this approach doesn't fix the root of the problem – only the symptoms – it would be nice to have this possibility always on hand. For technical background of this problem (PT_LOAD[0].p_offset==0), please look at the UPX bugtracker⁴. ¹ http://upx.sourceforge.net/ ² https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPX ³ https://github.com/pwaller/goupx ⁴ http://sourceforge.net/p/upx/bugs/195/ |
re #10, my #9 reply is to #8, which is about an entirely different problem. i'm not saying that the ever-growing binaries is not our problem, only that i don't believe that upx not accepting our binaries is our problem. it's clear that upx isn't able to handle all possible and correct ELF files (i.e. if the kernel can execute our binaries just fine, it's upx's problem to not be able to compress them). |
More detail. The Plan 9 symbol table is about to be deleted. Here is a reference point, adding one new entry to the list above: $ ls -l *1.* -rwxr-xr-x 1 j staff 1525984 2 Dez 21:44 hello_1.1.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 j staff 2192672 2 Dez 21:40 hello_1.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 j staff 2474512 Feb 18 20:27 hello_1.2.x $ size *1.* __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex 1064960 94720 0 76000 1235680 12dae0 hello_1.1.2 1433600 147896 0 177440 1758936 1ad6d8 hello_1.2 1699840 160984 0 188944 2049768 1f46e8 hello_1.2.x Text has grown substantially, as has data. At least some of this is due to new annotations for the garbage collector. |
More detail. The Plan 9 symbol table is about to be deleted. Here is a reference point, adding one new entry to the list above: $ ls -l *1.* -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 1191952 Nov 30 10:25 x.1.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 1525936 Nov 30 10:20 x.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 2188576 Nov 30 10:18 x.1.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 2474512 Feb 18 20:27 hello_1.2.x $ size *1.* __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex 880640 33682096 0 4112 34566848 20f72c0 x.1.0 1064960 94656 0 75952 1235568 12da70 x.1.1 1429504 147896 0 177440 1754840 1ac6d8 x.1.2 1699840 160984 0 188944 2049768 1f46e8 hello_1.2.x Text has grown substantially, as has data. At least some of this is due to new annotations for the garbage collector. |
More detail. The Plan 9 symbol table is about to be deleted. Here is a reference point, adding one new entry to the list above: $ ls -l *1.* -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 1191952 Nov 30 10:25 x.1.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 1525936 Nov 30 10:20 x.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 2188576 Nov 30 10:18 x.1.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 2474512 Feb 18 20:27 hello_1.2.x $ size *1.* __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex 880640 33682096 0 4112 34566848 20f72c0 x.1.0 1064960 94656 0 75952 1235568 12da70 x.1.1 1429504 147896 0 177440 1754840 1ac6d8 x.1.2 1699840 160984 0 188944 2049768 1f46e8 x.1.2.x Text has grown substantially, as has data. At least some of this is due to new annotations for the garbage collector. |
This issue was updated by revision 964f6d3. Nothing reads the Plan 9 symbol table anymore. The last holdout was 'go tool nm', but since being rewritten in Go it uses the standard symbol table for the binary format (ELF, Mach-O, PE) instead. Removing the Plan 9 symbol table saves ~15% disk space on most binaries. Two supporting changes included in this CL: debug/gosym: use Go 1.2 pclntab to synthesize func-only symbol table when there is no Plan 9 symbol table debug/elf, debug/macho, debug/pe: ignore final EOF from ReadAt LGTM=r R=r, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/65740045 |
For my test case before/after deleting the Plan 9 symbol table: % ls -l ... -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 2474512 Feb 18 20:27 hello_1.2.x -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 2150928 Feb 18 22:28 hello_1.2.y % size ... __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex 1699840 160984 0 188944 2049768 1f46e8 hello_1.2.x 1376256 160984 0 188944 1726184 1a56e8 hello_1.2.x % So deleting the Plan 9 symbol table pretty close to exactly compensates for the GC information. We're back at Go 1.2 levels, still far too large but it's a start. |
This issue was updated by revision 2541cc8. Every function now has a gcargs and gclocals symbol holding associated garbage collection information. Put them all in the same meta-symbol as the go.func data and then drop individual entries from symbol table. Removing gcargs and gclocals reduces the size of a typical binary by 10%. LGTM=r R=r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/65870044 |
This issue was updated by revision ae38b03. For an ephemeral binary - one created, run, and then deleted - there is no need to write dwarf debug information, since the binary will not be used with gdb. In this case, instruct the linker not to spend time and disk space generating the debug information by passing the -w flag to the linker. Omitting dwarf information reduces the size of most binaries by 25%. We may be more aggressive about this in the future. LGTM=bradfitz, r R=r, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/65890043 |
After removing gcargs from the symbol table (stepping across CL 65870044) % ls -l x.1.2.[yz] -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 2150928 Feb 18 22:28 hello_1.2.y -rwxr-xr-x 1 r staff 1932880 Feb 19 08:14 hello_1.2.z % size x.1.2.[yz] __TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex 1376256 160984 0 188944 1726184 1a56e8 hello_1.2.y 1376256 160984 0 110160 1647400 192328 hello_1.2.z % It's now smaller than at 1.2 but still much bigger than 1.1, let alone 1.0. |
Let's not use this issue as a discussion list. Please ask questions on golang-dev. Thanks. pprof not working is issue #7452. Labels changed: added restrict-addissuecomment-commit. |
This is as fixed as it is going to be for Go 1.3. Right now at tip + CL 80370045 on darwin/amd64, compiling this program: package main import "fmt" func main() { fmt.Println("hello, world") } I get 1830352 bytes for the binary. Assuming this is the same case for which Rob's numbers are reported, by this metric Go 1.3 will roll back more than half the size increase caused by Go 1.2 (relative to Go 1.1). Will leave further improvement for Go 1.4. Labels changed: added release-go1.4, removed release-go1.3. |
This issue was updated by revision a26c01a. LGTM=khr R=khr CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/80370045 |
I thought at first that restricting dead-code elimination to only those packages that are not imported by other packages that invoke |
Seems fragile. Do all distros use the same string? Gets the wrong answer with a class of (absurdly named) executables. I guess the current approach is also arguably fragile in that you could lose an init vs delete race. Feel free to send a CL if you want. :) Note that you have to manually inline strings.TrimSuffix. |
Change https://golang.org/cl/311790 mentions this issue: |
@josharian ah, gotcha... I didn't read the comment near I'm not sure whether it'll get accepted or not, but I sent the CL anyways. |
Currently Readlink gets linked into the binary even when Executable is not needed. This reduces a simple "os.Stdout.Write([]byte("hello"))" by ~10KiB. Previously the executable path was read during init time, because deleting the executable would make "Readlink" return "(deleted)" suffix. There's probably a slight chance that the init time reading would return it anyways. Updates #6853 Change-Id: Ic76190c5b64d9320ceb489cd6a553108614653d1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/311790 Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Trust: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
I've been following this issue for a long time. Unlike the general community, I use Golang for systems programming (GUI, games). Maybe a compiler parameter could be added to remove traceback information. |
@SeanTolstoyevski you may find this interesting: https://commaok.xyz/post/no-line-numbers/ |
@SeanTolstoyevski We're reluctant to provide a mechanism to remove traceback information because it will break |
Wouldn't it be possible to just remove symbol names, file, and line numbers, keeping the traceback data otherwise intact? This way consumers of |
I'm sorry, I don't understand the suggestion. The traceback information is exactly symbol names, file names, and line numbers (see https://golang.org/pkg/runtime/#Frame). How can we remove those and leave the traceback data intact? |
The Perhaps there was some sort of miscommunication. I assumed what you considered impossible is completely removing traceback information in the sense that |
Thanks everyone for the replies. Data such as traceback, import path information take up enough size in executable files. @ianlancetaylor In fact, there is no need to remove it completely. For example, for module paths consider something simple like Sorry for the insufficient english. I tried to explain this simply. I may have chosen the wrong words. |
That is available as the |
You might find https://github.com/burrowers/garble useful, which attempts to remove some source code information when building. It's particularly aggressive with the |
If we dropped the file/line/function information, then logging and profiling would break. |
I think breaking profiling is acceptable if the user desires smaller binaries. As for logging, I'm not sure what a good trade off would be. |
I use gomobile for my Andr and iOS app, the android architecture with arm, arm64, 386, amd64,if i support so many architecture, it will generate each architecture with a libgojni.so,the aar file size increase fast, if the size can't be shrink, i think no one will use gomobile. |
This shrinks a binary that just does an http.ListenAndServe by about 90kb due to using less code for the static array. syms delta name old-size new-size pct-difference -54206 vendor/golang_org/x/net/http2/hpack.newStaticTable 55233 1027 -98.14% -4744 runtime.pclntab 1041055 1036311 -0.46% -204 runtime.findfunctab 10675 10471 -1.91% 8 runtime.typelink 9852 9860 0.08% 41 runtime.gcbss 869 910 4.72% 11711 vendor/golang_org/x/net/http2/hpack.init 572 12283 2047.38% sections delta name old-size new-size pct-difference -41888 .text 2185840 2143952 -1.92% -37644 .rodata 842131 804487 -4.47% -4744 .gopclntab 1041055 1036311 -0.46% -3343 .debug_info 981995 978652 -0.34% -2931 .debug_line 291295 288364 -1.01% 8 .typelink 9852 9860 0.08% 59 .debug_pubnames 81986 82045 0.07% 96 .symtab 186312 186408 0.05% 113 .debug_pubtypes 137500 137613 0.08% 128 .debug_frame 219140 219268 0.06% 220 .strtab 217109 217329 0.10% 2464 .bss 127752 130216 1.93% Updates golang/go#6853 Change-Id: I3383e63300585539507b75faac1072264d8f37e7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43090 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Inlining isn't performed on generated init functions. Removing the pair function and initializing the structs directly saves another 16k on a simple http.ListenAndServe() binary. delta name old new -58 runtime.findfunctab 10471 10413 -0.55% -41 runtime.gcbss 910 869 -4.51% 41 runtime.gcdata 612 653 6.70% -408 runtime.pclntab 1036311 1035903 -0.04% -11711 vendor/golang_org/x/net/http2/hpack.init 12283 572 -95.34% Updates golang/go#6853 Change-Id: Ibccc796fe7403674cf4b4561acf9551d76ff11e8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43190 Run-TryBot: Todd Neal <todd@tneal.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Change https://go.dev/cl/462300 mentions this issue: |
This CL changes how the x86 compiler stores and loads the frame pointer on each function prologue and epilogue, with the goal to reduce the final binary size without affecting performance. The compiler is currently using MOV instructions to load and store BP, which can take from 5 to 8 bytes each. This CL changes this approach so it emits PUSH/POP instructions instead, which always take only 1 byte each (when operating with BP). It can also avoid using the SUBQ/ADDQ to grow the stack for functions that have frame pointer but does not have local variables. On Windows, this CL reduces the go toolchain size from 15,697,920 bytes to 15,584,768 bytes, a reduction of 0.7%. Example of epilog and prologue for a function with 0x10 bytes of local variables: Before === SUBQ $0x18, SP MOVQ BP, 0x10(SP) LEAQ 0x10(SP), BP ... function body ... MOVQ 0x10(SP), BP ADDQ $0x18, SP RET === After === PUSHQ BP LEAQ 0(SP), BP SUBQ $0x10, SP ... function body ... MOVQ ADDQ $0x10, SP POPQ BP RET === Updates #6853 Change-Id: Ice9e14bbf8dff083c5f69feb97e9a764c3ca7785 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/462300 Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
Change https://go.dev/cl/463845 mentions this issue: |
This CL instructs the Go x86 compiler to load the frame pointer address using a MOV instead of a LEA instruction, being MOV 1 byte shorter: Before 55 PUSHQ BP 48 8d 2c 24 LEAQ 0(SP), BP After 55 PUSHQ BP 48 89 e5 MOVQ SP, BP This reduces the size of the Go toolchain ~0.06%. Updates #6853 Change-Id: I5557cf34c47e871d264ba0deda9b78338681a12c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/463845 Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL changes how the x86 compiler stores and loads the frame pointer on each function prologue and epilogue, with the goal to reduce the final binary size without affecting performance. The compiler is currently using MOV instructions to load and store BP, which can take from 5 to 8 bytes each. This CL changes this approach so it emits PUSH/POP instructions instead, which always take only 1 byte each (when operating with BP). It can also avoid using the SUBQ/ADDQ to grow the stack for functions that have frame pointer but does not have local variables. On Windows, this CL reduces the go toolchain size from 15,697,920 bytes to 15,584,768 bytes, a reduction of 0.7%. Example of epilog and prologue for a function with 0x10 bytes of local variables: Before === SUBQ $0x18, SP MOVQ BP, 0x10(SP) LEAQ 0x10(SP), BP ... function body ... MOVQ 0x10(SP), BP ADDQ $0x18, SP RET === After === PUSHQ BP LEAQ 0(SP), BP SUBQ $0x10, SP ... function body ... MOVQ ADDQ $0x10, SP POPQ BP RET === Updates golang#6853 Change-Id: Ice9e14bbf8dff083c5f69feb97e9a764c3ca7785 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/462300 Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
This CL instructs the Go x86 compiler to load the frame pointer address using a MOV instead of a LEA instruction, being MOV 1 byte shorter: Before 55 PUSHQ BP 48 8d 2c 24 LEAQ 0(SP), BP After 55 PUSHQ BP 48 89 e5 MOVQ SP, BP This reduces the size of the Go toolchain ~0.06%. Updates golang#6853 Change-Id: I5557cf34c47e871d264ba0deda9b78338681a12c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/463845 Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: