You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[Update: extract.variable and extract-variable.all are done. So is inline-variable. Retitled to narrower scope of inline-all. --adonovan]
Original title: codeaction: replace every use-case of a variable with its defined expression, extract every identical expression
within function to a new variable
the first half part is :Rafactor inline_var, and second part is :Rafactor extract_var new_var, it is from a nvim plugin refactoring.nvim using treesitter under the hood, I use this two quite frequently to eliminate unnecessary variable as well as introduce new variable for some repeated expression, the problem is it fails (or not accurate) in complex situations, so I wish gopls would support this directly.
What did you see happen?
Currently gopls supports extract a single expression to a new variable, I'd say extract every repeated expression under selection would be more useful, since the latter contains the former.
[Update: extract.variable and extract-variable.all are done. So is inline-variable. Retitled to narrower scope of inline-all. --adonovan]
Original title: codeaction: replace every use-case of a variable with its defined expression, extract every identical expression
within function to a new variable
gopls version
Build info
golang.org/x/tools/gopls (devel)
golang.org/x/tools/gopls@(devel)
github.com/BurntSushi/toml@v1.2.1 h1:9F2/+DoOYIOksmaJFPw1tGFy1eDnIJXg+UHjuD8lTak=
github.com/google/go-cmp@v0.6.0 h1:ofyhxvXcZhMsU5ulbFiLKl/XBFqE1GSq7atu8tAmTRI=
golang.org/x/exp/typeparams@v0.0.0-20221212164502-fae10dda9338 h1:2O2DON6y3XMJiQRAS1UWU+54aec2uopH3x7MAiqGW6Y=
golang.org/x/mod@v0.21.0 h1:vvrHzRwRfVKSiLrG+d4FMl/Qi4ukBCE6kZlTUkDYRT0=
golang.org/x/sync@v0.8.0 h1:3NFvSEYkUoMifnESzZl15y791HH1qU2xm6eCJU5ZPXQ=
golang.org/x/telemetry@v0.0.0-20240927184629-19675431963b h1:PfPrmVDHfPgLVpiYnf2R1uL8SCXBjkqT51+f/fQHR6Q=
golang.org/x/text@v0.19.0 h1:kTxAhCbGbxhK0IwgSKiMO5awPoDQ0RpfiVYBfK860YM=
golang.org/x/tools@v0.21.1-0.20240508182429-e35e4ccd0d2d => ../
golang.org/x/vuln@v1.0.4 h1:SP0mPeg2PmGCu03V+61EcQiOjmpri2XijexKdzv8Z1I=
honnef.co/go/tools@v0.4.7 h1:9MDAWxMoSnB6QoSqiVr7P5mtkT9pOc1kSxchzPCnqJs=
mvdan.cc/gofumpt@v0.7.0 h1:bg91ttqXmi9y2xawvkuMXyvAA/1ZGJqYAEGjXuP0JXU=
mvdan.cc/xurls/v2@v2.5.0 h1:lyBNOm8Wo71UknhUs4QTFUNNMyxy2JEIaKKo0RWOh+8=
go: go1.23.2
go env
What did you do?
iShot_2024-10-29_11.52.53.mp4
the first half part is
:Rafactor inline_var, and second part is:Rafactor extract_var new_var, it is from a nvim plugin refactoring.nvim using treesitter under the hood, I use this two quite frequently to eliminate unnecessary variable as well as introduce new variable for some repeated expression, the problem is it fails (or not accurate) in complex situations, so I wish gopls would support this directly.What did you see happen?
Currently gopls supports extract a single expression to a new variable, I'd say extract every repeated expression under selection would be more useful, since the latter contains the former.
What did you expect to see?
see above
Editor and settings
No response
Logs
No response