Skip to content

crypto/x509: overly broad excluded constraints [1.25 backport] #77968

Description

@rolandshoemaker

When considering if a excluded constraint applies to a wildcard SAN, we are being overly broad in the old name constraint matching logic that still exists in 1.25.

If we have an excluded constraint for bar.com, we consider *.foo.com excluded.

Since this is overly restrictive, rather than overly lax, we do not consider this a security issue.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    BackportIssues created for requesting a backport of a change to a previous Go version.CherryPickApprovedUsed during the release process for point releases

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions