Go 2 language change template
Authors: Ian Lance Taylor, Robert Griesemer, Brad Fitzpatrick
Last updated: January, 2020
We get more language change proposals than we have time to review thoroughly. Changing the language has serious consequences that could affect the entire Go ecosystem, so many factors come into consideration.
If you just have an idea for a language change, and would like help turning it into a complete proposal, we ask that you not open an issue, but instead discuss the idea on a forum such as the golang-nuts mailing list.
Before proceeding with a full proposal, please review the requirements listed in the Go blog article Go 2, here we come!: Each language change proposal must:
- address an important issue for many people,
- have minimal impact on everybody else, and
- come with a clear and well-understood solution.
If you believe that your proposal meets these criteria and wish to proceed, then in order to help with review we ask that you place your proposal in context by answering the questions below as best you can. You do not have to answer every question but please do your best.
- Would you consider yourself a novice, intermediate, or experienced Go programmer?
- What other languages do you have experience with?
- Would this change make Go easier or harder to learn, and why?
- Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?
- If so, how does this proposal differ?
- Who does this proposal help, and why?
- What is the proposed change?
- Please describe as precisely as possible the change to the language.
- What would change in the [https://golang.org/ref/spec](language spec)?
- Please also describe the change informally, as in a class teaching Go.
- Is this change backward compatible?
- Breaking the Go 1 compatibility guarantee is a large cost and requires a large benefit.
- Show example code before and after the change.
- What is the cost of this proposal? (Every language change has a cost).
- How many tools (such as vet, gopls, gofmt, goimports, etc.) would be affected?
- What is the compile time cost?
- What is the run time cost?
- Can you describe a possible implementation?
- Do you have a prototype? (This is not required.)
- How would the language spec change?
- Orthogonality: how does this change interact or overlap with existing features?
- Is the goal of this change a performance improvement?
- If so, what quantifiable improvement should we expect?
- How would we measure it?
- Does this affect error handling?
- If so, how does this differ from previous error handling proposals?
- Is this about generics?
What to avoid
If you are unable to answer many of these questions, perhaps your change has some of these characteristics:
- Your proposal simply changes syntax from X to Y because you prefer Y.
- You believe that Go needs feature X because other languages have it.
- You have an idea for a new feature but it is very difficult to implement.
- Your proposal states a problem rather than a solution.
Such proposals are likely to be rejected quickly.
We believe that following this template will save reviewer time when considering language change proposals.