Help popular auto value extensions adopt incremental processing

[bingranl]

• auto-value-parcel: Merged
• auto-value-gson: Merged
• auto-value-cursor: Supported since 2.0.0-rc1
• paperparcel: Open issue
• auto-value-moshi: Merged
• auto-value-redacted: Supported since 1.1.0
• auto-value-with: Supported since 1.1.0-rc1

[autonomousapps]

Here's an associated issue on gradle/gradle: gradle/gradle#5277

[tbroyer]

Fwiw, autovalue extensions are not processors themselves. There's a new API in 1.6.3rc1 to be implemented by extensions: http://static.javadoc.io/com.google.auto.value/auto-value-annotations/1.6.3rc1/com/google/auto/value/extension/AutoValueExtension.html#incrementalType-javax.annotation.processing.ProcessingEnvironment-

[bingranl]

Yeah, our goal is to let extensions figure out if they are compatible with incremental processing and implement that new API.

[gabrielittner]

I'll look into my two extensions later this week (with and cursor).

[tbroyer]

I meant: the open issues linked above (auto-value-gson and auto-value-gson) don't talk about the AutoValueExtension API, they only link to Gradle's documentation.

[gabrielittner]

auto-value-with 1.1.0-rc1 and auto-value-cursor 2.0.0-rc1 are on their way to maven central. Both are ISOLATING.

[bingranl]

@gabrielittner Great, thanks!!

[ZacSweers]

auto-value-gson, auto-value-moshi, and auto-value-parcel all support this now (extensions are ISOLATING and the factory processors are AGGREGATING), and will be in their next releases

[bingranl]

auto-value-redacted is ISOLATING now. auto-value-bundle is removed from the list since it is not released.

[emartynov]

People, what about AutoFactory?

[bejibx]

PaperParcel supports incap since 2.0.7, see changelog.

[bingranl]

@bejibx Thanks for great work! I am closing this issue because all of the popular auto value extensions support incremental annotation processing! Thanks everyone!