A-D review: Remove the Preventing Tracking Clients section. #295
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This should be discussed on the mailing list before merging to ensure there is WG consensus. |
|
@AGWA do you recall the results of that discussion? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
EKR wrote:
I think "tracked or traced" by who. As far as a deterministic scheme, that seems like a wg decision, but what would be the implication for RSA-PSS?Eran, Al and I discussed this. Al wrote...
I don't think this document should be talking about this at all; this seems like a concession to a gossip design which hasn't yet been experimented with, built, or standardised... Would this section not better live in whatever gossip docs which build upon -bis, where it's important for that model's security/privacy guarantees?...and then we agreed to remove this section.