Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix generic comparisons on protobuf messages #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 6, 2019

Conversation

@dsnet
Copy link
Member

dsnet commented Nov 6, 2019

Generated protobuf messages contain internal data structures
that general purpose comparison functions (e.g., reflect.DeepEqual,
pretty.Compare, etc) do not properly compare. It is already the case
today that these functions may report a difference when two messages
are actually semantically equivalent.

Fix all usages by either calling proto.Equal directly if
the top-level types are themselves proto.Message, or by calling
cmp.Equal with the cmp.Comparer(proto.Equal) option specified.
This option teaches cmp to use proto.Equal anytime it encounters
proto.Message types.

Generated protobuf messages contain internal data structures
that general purpose comparison functions (e.g., reflect.DeepEqual,
pretty.Compare, etc) do not properly compare. It is already the case
today that these functions may report a difference when two messages
are actually semantically equivalent.

Fix all usages by either calling proto.Equal directly if
the top-level types are themselves proto.Message, or by calling
cmp.Equal with the cmp.Comparer(proto.Equal) option specified.
This option teaches cmp to use proto.Equal anytime it encounters
proto.Message types.
@dsnet dsnet requested review from finfinack and google/cacerts as code owners Nov 6, 2019
@aww-aww
aww-aww approved these changes Nov 6, 2019
@aww-aww aww-aww merged commit 83e057c into google:master Nov 6, 2019
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
cla/google All necessary CLAs are signed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.