fix(internal/godocfx): use correct anchor links#3738
Merged
gcf-merge-on-green[bot] merged 2 commits intomasterfrom Feb 25, 2021
Merged
fix(internal/godocfx): use correct anchor links#3738gcf-merge-on-green[bot] merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
gcf-merge-on-green[bot] merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
google-cla
bot
added
the
cla: yes
tbpg
added
the
automerge
gcf-merge-on-green
bot
removed
the
automerge
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This works by pre-processing the package and generating all of the correct anchor links. Then, when converting an ID to a link, we check if the ID is listed in the map of anchors.
It's possible there will be some duplication between IDs. But, that is already an issue because there is no way to know which one is correct to link to. An alternative would be to set the anchor for any duplicated links to
""so they don't link at all. In practice, I don't think this is an issue. So, I left it as-is and we can revisit later if needed.Fixes #3737.