Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alternative design for lowercase l (to better distinguish it from uppercase i) #56

Closed
paperboyo opened this issue Nov 29, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@paperboyo
Copy link

Thank you ever so much for all your work! We recently started using Open Sans, but I can’t seem to find an alternative l design that will make eg. this more readable:

image

Would be great to be able to switch to it via CSS (if not have it as default). Or is this really a feature request for Noto Sans?

@kenmcd
Copy link

kenmcd commented Nov 30, 2022

Use Stylistic Set 1 (ss01)
or Stylistic Set 3 (ss03)
or Stylistic Alternates (salt)
for an alternate uppercase I.

2022-11-29_16-04-21

@paperboyo
Copy link
Author

Thanks. I would rather have an l with a pronounced terminal, but that may be an aesthetic choice (somehow I feel I could use it in the whole app as less intrusive, instead of targetting weirder – almost serif – I to odd places).

But the thing is, possibly because of google/fonts#1335, I have no access to alternates at all the way I’ve done it. I will keep this issue open in case anyone has an opinion on a design of l (or, indeed, if someone would kindly point out that I’m being dumb and there is a way to ask Google Fonts API to include certain OpenType features). But feel free to close it or I will if no movement.

Thanks again.

@kenmcd
Copy link

kenmcd commented Nov 30, 2022

Currently you cannot use stylistic sets with the web fonts.

Noto Sans is nearly identical, and it defaults to the alternate uppercase I. The weight is slightly different, but you could use the variable font if that is an issue.
NotoSans

@paperboyo
Copy link
Author

Thanks!
Not being able to use OT features with Fonts API, while serious, is a dup. And alternative design for l sounds like it might be an issue for Noto (and a long shot, probably). So… closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants