Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix the handling of pseudoclass-based generic cosmetic filters #291

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 25, 2021
Merged

Fix the handling of pseudoclass-based generic cosmetic filters #291

merged 1 commit into from Jan 25, 2021

Conversation

hawkeye116477
Copy link
Contributor

@hawkeye116477 hawkeye116477 commented Jan 18, 2021

This fixes #290.

@hawkeye116477 @gorhill
Fix the handling of pseudoclass-based generic cosmetic filters
aabe611 
Related issues:
- uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues#464
- gorhill#290


Regression from:
4e91155

Pseudoclass-based generic cosmetic filters were improperly seen
as invalid following the regression.

Co-authored-by:  gorhill <585534+gorhill@users.noreply.github.com>
@THEtomaso THEtomaso mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2021
Open
@THEtomaso
Copy link

@THEtomaso THEtomaso commented Jan 18, 2021

Thanks, hawkeye116477.
Don't know what we'd do without you! :)

@JustOff JustOff mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2021
Closed
@JustOff
Copy link
Collaborator

@JustOff JustOff commented Jan 25, 2021

Thank you!

@JustOff JustOff merged commit 3d5ad9f into gorhill:master Jan 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix the handling of pseudoclass-based generic cosmetic filters
3 participants
@hawkeye116477 @THEtomaso @JustOff