This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

contribute to The Changelog #109

Closed
chadwhitacre opened this Issue Jul 5, 2012 · 19 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@chadwhitacre
Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 5, 2012

was: partner with influential bloggers / open source evangelists

Via HN:

Another idea that could work well is partnering up with some influential bloggers / open source evangelists and holding an international "Feed a coder" day, which brings awareness to the open source community and asks people to make a donation to their favourite projects / libraries / Wordpress plugins on that day.

There are a lot of Wordpress Bloggers out there who would be happy to donate to their favourite plugin authors but just haven't and this could push them over the line (this is just one community I'm quite involved with).

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 5, 2012

Contributor

Let's turn this into a ticket about evangelizing Gittip in the open source community. Who needs to find out about Gittip and what channels can we use to spread the word?

The one I have my eye on is The Changelog, for which @steveklabnik is a contributor. How far along does Gittip have to be to get on there?

Where else should we be promoting Gittip? Please tell me.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 5, 2012

Let's turn this into a ticket about evangelizing Gittip in the open source community. Who needs to find out about Gittip and what channels can we use to spread the word?

The one I have my eye on is The Changelog, for which @steveklabnik is a contributor. How far along does Gittip have to be to get on there?

Where else should we be promoting Gittip? Please tell me.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 5, 2012

Contributor

/cc @alex, @jtauber, @jacobian, @freakboy3742

Let's page @waferbaby as well. Thanks to @synapticarbors, I believe I'll have an interview on usesthis.com later this month.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 5, 2012

/cc @alex, @jtauber, @jacobian, @freakboy3742

Let's page @waferbaby as well. Thanks to @synapticarbors, I believe I'll have an interview on usesthis.com later this month.

@steveklabnik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@steveklabnik

steveklabnik Jul 5, 2012

It doesn't have to be far along, but since I'm on the leaderboard for contributions, I shouldn't cover it. Wynn or Adam might be interested, though, you should email them.

It doesn't have to be far along, but since I'm on the leaderboard for contributions, I shouldn't cover it. Wynn or Adam might be interested, though, you should email them.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 5, 2012

Contributor

I think it's going to be really important for people like @mitsuhiko to put in a plug during conference talks, etc. Any time left at DjangoCon Europe?

The bottom line is that it can't depend solely on me for Gittip to grow. If you all want it to exist then let's make this happen.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 5, 2012

I think it's going to be really important for people like @mitsuhiko to put in a plug during conference talks, etc. Any time left at DjangoCon Europe?

The bottom line is that it can't depend solely on me for Gittip to grow. If you all want it to exist then let's make this happen.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 5, 2012

Contributor

Got it, thanks @steveklabnik. I've reached out to Wynn and Adam.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 5, 2012

Got it, thanks @steveklabnik. I've reached out to Wynn and Adam.

@rubiii

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rubiii

rubiii Jul 5, 2012

hey guys. is peter cooper aware of this project? apart from the changelog, he's the one i would turn to for "publicity".

rubiii commented Jul 5, 2012

hey guys. is peter cooper aware of this project? apart from the changelog, he's the one i would turn to for "publicity".

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Jul 5, 2012

Contributor

@rubiii Thanks for jumping in. I've contacted him.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Jul 5, 2012

@rubiii Thanks for jumping in. I've contacted him.

@rhertzog

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rhertzog

rhertzog Oct 5, 2012

If you want gittip to grow, you must provide better widgets for developers who are seeking donations via gittip. The current one is not good enough... for example one should be able to integrate the list of donors with the amount they have given (to prove that donations are handled transparently). You could also provide a progress bar showing how far the developer is from its funding goal.

The word of mouth is still the best publicity and for this you must have a successful donation widget. And to succeed, it must inspire trust and build up on proven marketing strategies.

rhertzog commented Oct 5, 2012

If you want gittip to grow, you must provide better widgets for developers who are seeking donations via gittip. The current one is not good enough... for example one should be able to integrate the list of donors with the amount they have given (to prove that donations are handled transparently). You could also provide a progress bar showing how far the developer is from its funding goal.

The word of mouth is still the best publicity and for this you must have a successful donation widget. And to succeed, it must inspire trust and build up on proven marketing strategies.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Oct 8, 2012

Contributor

From private email with @rhertzog:

On Gittip, donors are recognized on the homepage, unless they opt to be anonymous.

This is not enough because they don't get to see it before they make the donation. And people are supposed to come from the developer's webpage, not from gittip.com directly.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Oct 8, 2012

From private email with @rhertzog:

On Gittip, donors are recognized on the homepage, unless they opt to be anonymous.

This is not enough because they don't get to see it before they make the donation. And people are supposed to come from the developer's webpage, not from gittip.com directly.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Oct 8, 2012

Contributor

If you want gittip to grow, you must provide better widgets.

@rhertzog Agreed, and we have a few specific tickets toward that end. The idea of a progress bar is covered in #150. See also #175 and #177.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Oct 8, 2012

If you want gittip to grow, you must provide better widgets.

@rhertzog Agreed, and we have a few specific tickets toward that end. The idea of a progress bar is covered in #150. See also #175 and #177.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Oct 8, 2012

Contributor

[O]ne should be able to integrate the list of donors with the amount they have given (to prove that donations are handled transparently).

Well, making particular tips non-anonymous would be a fundamental change for Gittip. The principle here is "no strings attached" for both sides of the equation. Anonymity in the particulars means that when I stop giving to you, there's no social awkwardness the next time I see you. This principle is essential to Gittip, though see #236 and #306 for some ideas on softening it somewhat.

That said, I think there are ways to increase transparency as you suggest without violating the anonymity principle. For example, individuals have access to a detailed history page (#43) and now also to a bar chart of gift amounts (#300). I've ticketed the idea of making these public as #325.

This is not enough because they don't get to see it before they make the donation[;] people are supposed to come from the developer's webpage, not from gittip.com directly.

Good point. It seems that having this info available on each profile page would address this.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Oct 8, 2012

[O]ne should be able to integrate the list of donors with the amount they have given (to prove that donations are handled transparently).

Well, making particular tips non-anonymous would be a fundamental change for Gittip. The principle here is "no strings attached" for both sides of the equation. Anonymity in the particulars means that when I stop giving to you, there's no social awkwardness the next time I see you. This principle is essential to Gittip, though see #236 and #306 for some ideas on softening it somewhat.

That said, I think there are ways to increase transparency as you suggest without violating the anonymity principle. For example, individuals have access to a detailed history page (#43) and now also to a bar chart of gift amounts (#300). I've ticketed the idea of making these public as #325.

This is not enough because they don't get to see it before they make the donation[;] people are supposed to come from the developer's webpage, not from gittip.com directly.

Good point. It seems that having this info available on each profile page would address this.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Oct 8, 2012

Contributor

@rhertzog I've reticked the idea of exposing giving details through the/a widget as #326.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Oct 8, 2012

@rhertzog I've reticked the idea of exposing giving details through the/a widget as #326.

@abnor

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@abnor

abnor Apr 11, 2013

Is this a place to make a list of websites we should be partnering with? Or should I open up a new ticket?

abnor commented Apr 11, 2013

Is this a place to make a list of websites we should be partnering with? Or should I open up a new ticket?

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Apr 12, 2013

Contributor

@abnor I think we should have a ticket for each potential partnership, possibly in a separate "Partnerships" repo.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Apr 12, 2013

@abnor I think we should have a ticket for each potential partnership, possibly in a separate "Partnerships" repo.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Apr 12, 2013

Contributor

I've got an invitation to do a guest post on the The Changelog. Let's use this ticket for that.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Apr 12, 2013

I've got an invitation to do a guest post on the The Changelog. Let's use this ticket for that.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Apr 12, 2013

Contributor

@abnor Let's use this repo. Go ahead and make new tickets in this repo, one for each website we should partner with.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Apr 12, 2013

@abnor Let's use this repo. Go ahead and make new tickets in this repo, one for each website we should partner with.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chadwhitacre

chadwhitacre Apr 12, 2013

Contributor

@abnor There's a "Partnerships" label we can use for it.

Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Apr 12, 2013

@abnor There's a "Partnerships" label we can use for it.

@abnor

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@abnor

abnor Apr 12, 2013

Are you being indecisive? :P I'll link back to here with any new partnership tickets we create.

abnor commented Apr 12, 2013

Are you being indecisive? :P I'll link back to here with any new partnership tickets we create.

@chadwhitacre

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.