Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2018. It is now read-only.

Relicense as MIT #4626

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2017
Merged

Relicense as MIT #4626

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2017

Conversation

chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

You cool with this @clone1018?

@clone1018
Copy link
Contributor

I like the MIT license. Are there any special processes going from public domain to MIT?

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are there any special processes going from public domain to MIT?

According to @massonpj in irl convo there are not.

@Changaco
Copy link
Contributor

This might not have gone over well if Gratipay was a library or app that other projects depend on and which is packaged by third parties, but since it isn't you probably won't hear anyone complaining.

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Sep 13, 2017

Is that because the MIT license requires derivatives to also be MIT license? I'm new at this stuff.

@Changaco
Copy link
Contributor

@mattbk No, the MIT license isn't a copyleft license.

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Sep 13, 2017

Thanks @Changaco, you made me read it again, slowly. 😁 👍

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased. Good to merge, @clone1018?

@clone1018 clone1018 merged commit 0d2659e into master Sep 14, 2017
@clone1018 clone1018 deleted the mit branch September 14, 2017 16:18
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

💃

@massonpj
Copy link

Hi all. Thanks @whit537 for introducing this. I am happy to help if anything is needed. We'd like to support your work, but would only be able to if the projects carry an OSI approved license, not public domain (https://opensource.org/faq#public-domain) or CC0 (https://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero).

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @massonpj.

If you're referring to our own code, then we're almost there: this PR is merged and relicenses our main repo, gratipay.com. We have two more minor repos outstanding, should be easy now that this PR is in.

If you're referring to projects that we would support with funds collected via the new form on our homepage, then that's fine, we can definitely enforce that restriction there.

If you're referring to the almost 800 projects that are already on Gratipay under our old model (weekly micro-payments direct to the project), we might need to drop to a phone call to sort that out. Should we schedule a call? Maybe we drop to email to schedule? chad@gratipay.com

@massonpj
Copy link

Hey @whit537,

Great to hear you're migrating gratipay code to an OSI approved license--we love that--and thus makes it easy for us to support the project as a whole.

We'll also be happy to promote/support your new forum for projects that carry an OSI approved license.

Regarding the others from the old model, yeah we'd have to delineate those, and quarantine them from any OSI branding, promotion, support. But it's not a problem at all. If we can work with Microsoft and Adobe to support their open source efforts, while avoiding their proprietary stuff, we can make it work here too.

We do not want to be a burden/hassle to work with, but yeah let's get on a call. I will email you to set that up.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good, @massonpj. Got your mail and looking forward to chatting on Tuesday!

chadwhitacre added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants