New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unify track style for various tracktypes #136
Comments
|
This sounds really promising. Do you have a quick example showcasing your proposal – maybe a comparison to the current tracktype rendering? |
|
refs #14 |
|
My apologies for not responding to this properly! I created a side-by-side comparison for my SotM talk on openstreetmap-carto: I think the general approach is the correct one, but I think you can make more of a distinction between the grades e.g. grade 2 and 3 are very similar. There has been some refactoring to the track rendering since you first worked on this, but I'd be happy to review a pull request based on v2.5.0 or later. |
Fixes gravitystorm#14 Fixes gravitystorm#136 The previous tracktypes were very inconsistent with tracks appearing at different zoom levels depending on if they were bridge or not. This gives a consistent styling, based on gravitystorm#136. On zooms 13-14 tracks are slightly smaller, instead of zoom 13 only
This is a rewrite of gravitystorm#205 Closes gravitystorm#205 Fixes gravitystorm#446
This is a rewrite of gravitystorm#205 Closes gravitystorm#205 Fixes gravitystorm#446
This is a rewrite of gravitystorm#205 Closes gravitystorm#205 Fixes gravitystorm#446



Current style for tracktype makes it difficult to determine grade visually. I've tuned the style for #tracks-notunnel-nobridge to feel the difference. Improvemets:
Please check it and tell mie if you like it or if you have even better idea for improvements. But IMHO current tracktype visual representation is confusing and should be improved.
If accepted, the style should be distributed to all other related layers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: