New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gdk update #471

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 17, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@Susurrus
Contributor

Susurrus commented Mar 17, 2017

This enables all types that were added in gtk-rs/gdk#144

Susurrus added some commits Mar 17, 2017

@GuillaumeGomez

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GuillaumeGomez
Member

GuillaumeGomez commented Mar 17, 2017

👍

cc @EPashkin

@EPashkin

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@EPashkin

EPashkin Mar 17, 2017

Member

👍
@Susurrus Thanks

Member

EPashkin commented Mar 17, 2017

👍
@Susurrus Thanks

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez merged commit b266e67 into gtk-rs:master Mar 17, 2017

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details

@Susurrus Susurrus deleted the Susurrus:gdk_update branch Mar 17, 2017

@Susurrus

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Susurrus

Susurrus Mar 17, 2017

Contributor

One thing I meant to note when I first posted that was that I don't know why gdk::Atom is still ignored for generating functions. There are still about 25 functions that only depend on Gdk::Atom and were not generated. Is there something I'm missing for that?

Contributor

Susurrus commented Mar 17, 2017

One thing I meant to note when I first posted that was that I don't know why gdk::Atom is still ignored for generating functions. There are still about 25 functions that only depend on Gdk::Atom and were not generated. Is there something I'm missing for that?

@EPashkin

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@EPashkin

EPashkin Mar 17, 2017

Member

I don't remember reason but seems need to add both "Gdk.Atom" and "Gdk.Atom_" to deignore it
and to gdk too.

Member

EPashkin commented Mar 17, 2017

I don't remember reason but seems need to add both "Gdk.Atom" and "Gdk.Atom_" to deignore it
and to gdk too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment