Seamless support for both expressions and functions in the r?ply family, maintaining consistency for both side effects and output.
Fixes #158 and #164. Rebased variant of #165.
Could you please merge/rebase again?
fixes # 158 by evaluating the .expr parameter and calling it one time…
… less if it actually is an expression and not a function
Rebased and force-pushed. I believe there is no need to provide a dedicated implementation for r_ply.
Test currently failing. Will fix.
fix tests to account for .n being a factor in result of rdply
Fixed test, ready to merge.