smpeg2 new recipe

[Begasus]

No description provided.

[fbrosson]

I think underscores are not allowed for library versioning. All those I have seen so far only have digits and dots.

[Begasus]

It's a rework on the smpeg recipe that's in the tree atm, if it needs corrections I would like to hear :)

[Begasus]

The created lib is called "libsmpeg2-2.0.so.0.0.0", should I alter this as?:
lib:libsmpeg2$secondaryArchSuffix = 0.0.0 compat >= 0
PS, in the sdl libs I see more "_" in the recipes?

[Begasus]

Or should we go with lib:libsmpeg2$secondaryArchSuffix = $portVersion compat >= 2.0.0 ?

[fbrosson]

I think it should be just lib:libsmpeg2_2.0$secondaryArchSuffix without any lib versioning because a "2.0" versioning is already in the name of the lib before the ".so". BTW, you might wish to replace the _2.0 by _${portVersion%\.*} to obtain: lib:libsmpeg2_${portVersion%\.*}$secondaryArchSuffix but I don't know if there is a wide acceptance for that. (I've used it in a couple of recipes and it was accepted ;-)

haikuporter has an excellent option that I always use: -S. It enables a strict mode which reports many errors, like, for example, when you forget items for the PROVIDES* or REQUIRES*. So if you forget a dependency on an external lib it will spot it. And if a libname is wrong in the provides, it will also tell you that you don't have a provides for it. I really recommend always using the strict mode. BTW, if you use it on a recipe that has any of the errors it can spot then it will not create the hpkgs, and I like this behaviour ;-)

[Begasus]

Using the -S option for a while already, no problems so far

[fbrosson]

Sorry, I though you were not using the -S option, but you are.
I though haikuporter would have complained about the «= 2.0_0.0.0 compat >= 2.0_0» but it looks like it does not. So maybe this is not an error after all.

[Begasus]

There are a few nice options that can be used with haikuporter :)
If the general feeling about this to change the lib versioning please let me know :)

[Begasus]

Any thoughts on this if it needs changing or not?

[waddlesplash]

Since that's what the .so is using, let's keep it.

[fbrosson]

Sorry, I was busy with other recipes and did not test this one yet. I'm trying to build vlc_x86-2.2.1 on x86_gcc2. But I'll give smpeg2 a try asap.