Skip to content

Conversation

@jbloom22
Copy link
Contributor

@jbloom22 jbloom22 commented Dec 27, 2018

@danking I rebased in the process of addressing your requested changes, so git won't allow me to re-open the closed branch #4842. I think this is now safe with regard to closing resources. Do you see a way to not include the branch on binary twice? I'd prefer to consider changing the types of streams/buffers as another PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@danking danking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could contort the code to avoid the cast, but IMHO, this is pretty legible as written. Resources are handled correctly with write file and using.

We can punt on the buffering issues. I suppose a lot of this will be re-written in C++ shortly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants