Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update hapijs/inert to 2.1.6 from 2.1.5 #2631

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2015

Conversation

kanongil
Copy link
Contributor

@kanongil kanongil commented Jul 6, 2015

Fixes invalid ETag generation on initial 304 responses, or range requests.

@AdriVanHoudt
Copy link
Contributor

related to #2628?

@kanongil
Copy link
Contributor Author

kanongil commented Jul 6, 2015

Yes. It fixes bad etag generation from point 10 of the last issue. Check hapijs/inert#27 & hapijs/inert#28 for further details.

@hueniverse hueniverse added bug Bug or defect dependency Update module dependency labels Jul 6, 2015
@hueniverse hueniverse added this to the 8.8.1 milestone Jul 6, 2015
@hueniverse hueniverse self-assigned this Jul 6, 2015
hueniverse pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2015
@hueniverse hueniverse merged commit d8a57e4 into hapijs:master Jul 6, 2015
@AdriVanHoudt
Copy link
Contributor

@kanongil can you change the title to the style of Update hapijs/inert to 2.1.6 from 2.1.5 so the changelog will pick up the issues from it (see http://hapijs.com/updates)

@kanongil kanongil changed the title Update inert to 2.1.6 Update hapijs/inert to 2.1.6 from 2.1.5 Jul 30, 2015
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jan 9, 2020

This thread has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please open a new issue for related bugs or questions following the new issue template instructions.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Bug or defect dependency Update module dependency
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants