Nested whens don't work

[mgartner]

Why doesn't this work in my schema:

var schema = Joi.object().keys({
  setting: Joi.alternatives().when('$auth.credentials.cond1', {
    is: true,
    then: Joi.number().integer().required().when('$auth.credentials.cond2', {
      is: true,
      then: Joi.invalid(100, 101)
    }),
    otherwise: Joi.forbidden()
  })
});

When $auth.credentials.cond1 is true, and setting is not provided in the input object, there is no validation error when there should be because it is required.

[DavidTPate]

I think you're just using this incorrectly. If you look at any.when() you'll notice that for then and otherwise it uses these as an alternative schema whereas you are trying to treat them as a builder pattern style alternative.

So what your schema is saying is that the setting value when $auth.credentials.cond2 is true then it should validate against the schema Joi.invalid(100, 101) not against Joi.number().integer().required().invalid(100, 101). If you wanted to do that you would need to break out the schema Joi.number().integer().required() into its own variable and reference it in your then and otherwise.

[mgartner]

Ahh thanks for clarifying the docs.

So I tried using alternatives.when, but that leads to problems with required fields as well. In the example below, setting does not end up being required when $auth.credentials.cond1 is true.

var schema = Joi.object().keys({
  setting: Joi.alternatives().when('$auth.credentials.cond1', {
    is: true,
    then: Joi.alternatives().when('$auth.credentials.cond2', {
      is: true,
      then: Joi.number().integer().invalid(100, 101).required(),
      otherwise: Joi.number().interger().required()
    }),
    otherwise: Joi.forbidden()
  })
});

I tried to fix this below, but I get the error Cannot merge with another type: number.

var schema = Joi.object().keys({
  setting: Joi.when('$auth.credentials.cond1', {
    is: true,
    then: Joi.when('$auth.credentials.cond2', {
      is: true,
      then: Joi.number().integer().invalid(100, 101).required(),
      otherwise: Joi.number().interger().required()
    }),
    otherwise: Joi.forbidden()
  })
});

Any advice on how I should get the functionallity I want?

[mgartner]

Also, regarding your comment above about any.when(), in my experience this correctly ensures that setting is an integer, which contradicts what you said:

var schema = Joi.object().keys({
  setting: Joi.number().integer().when('$auth.credentials.cond1', {
    is: true,
    then: Joi.required(),
    otherwise: Joi.forbidden()
  })
});

[Marsup]

There might be a problem in the concat.

Using this :

var Joi = require('joi');

var schema = Joi.object().keys({
  setting: Joi.when('$auth.credentials.cond1', {
    is: true,
    then: Joi.when('$auth.credentials.cond2', {
      is: true,
      then: Joi.number().integer().invalid(100, 101).required(),
      otherwise: Joi.number().integer().required()
    }),
    otherwise: Joi.forbidden()
  })
});

var input = { setting: <whatever> };

Joi.validate(input, schema, { context: { auth: { credentials: { cond1: true, cond2: true }}}}, function(err, value) {
  console.log('err:', err);
  console.log('value:', value);
});

with the latest master works. Can you check if it covers your needs ?

[mgartner]

@Marsup you're right - it works in master, but fails with the below error in the v6.2.0 release. Is there any timeline for cutting a new version with the fix?

/Users/marcus/workspace/joi-test/node_modules/joi/node_modules/hoek/lib/index.js:683
    throw new Error(msgs.join(' ') || 'Unknown error');
          ^
Error: Cannot merge with another type: number
    at Object.exports.assert (/Users/marcus/workspace/joi-test/node_modules/joi/node_modules/hoek/lib/index.js:683:11)
    at internals.Any.concat (/Users/marcus/workspace/joi-test/node_modules/joi/lib/any.js:134:10)
    at internals.Any.when (/Users/marcus/workspace/joi-test/node_modules/joi/lib/any.js:356:48)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/marcus/workspace/joi-test/index.js:6:15)
    at Module._compile (module.js:460:26)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:478:10)
    at Module.load (module.js:355:32)
    at Function.Module._load (module.js:310:12)
    at Function.Module.runMain (module.js:501:10)
    at startup (node.js:129:16)

[Marsup]

Can be tonight. Does that address your PR too ?

[mgartner]

Awesome! 👏 Thanks for the help.

I'm not sure if this fix will provide a way for me to rename keys after validation like my PR does (or do something which is semantically equal). I'll look into that particular case and report back soon. This fix will definitely be fixing a specific case for me though, so thanks.

[Marsup]

Fixed by 7867225.

[Marsup]

Published. I'm still not convinced by the necessity of your PR, so don't expect this one anytime soon.

[lock]

This thread has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please open a new issue for related bugs or questions following the new issue template instructions.