Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix any.default() returns default object reference #774

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 26, 2015

Conversation

tnunes
Copy link
Contributor

@tnunes tnunes commented Nov 25, 2015

Addresses #773.

@Marsup
Copy link
Collaborator

Marsup commented Nov 26, 2015

To avoid any future regression I'd much rather like a test that checks modified defaults don't impact further validations, like you did in your original issue.

@Marsup Marsup added the bug Bug or defect label Nov 26, 2015
@Marsup Marsup added this to the 7.0.1 milestone Nov 26, 2015
@Marsup Marsup self-assigned this Nov 26, 2015
@tnunes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnunes commented Nov 26, 2015

Good idea! Just to be clear, should I add an additional test with those checks, or do you prefer me to change the current one? (maybe the title too?)

@tnunes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnunes commented Nov 26, 2015

I augmented the current test with the additional check. Let me know if this works for you or I should change it further.

Marsup added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2015
Fix any.default() returns default object reference
@Marsup Marsup merged commit 2d77d90 into hapijs:master Nov 26, 2015
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jan 9, 2020

This thread has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please open a new issue for related bugs or questions following the new issue template instructions.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Bug or defect
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants