Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes #1117: added -m 22100 = BitLocker #2258

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 31, 2019
Merged

fixes #1117: added -m 22100 = BitLocker #2258

merged 1 commit into from Dec 31, 2019

Conversation

@philsmd
Copy link
Member

philsmd commented Dec 31, 2019

I have implemented this new module and hash type. $bitlocker$0$... and $bitlocker$1$... hashes should now be working.

Thank you all and all the best for the year 2020 !

@jsteube

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

jsteube commented Dec 31, 2019

Super nice!

@jsteube jsteube merged commit 268e4be into hashcat:master Dec 31, 2019
1 check passed
1 check passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
@roycewilliams

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

roycewilliams commented Dec 31, 2019

@philsmd does this represent all major BitLocker hash subtypes, or are there others not represented here?

@jsteube

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

jsteube commented Dec 31, 2019

@roycewilliams It's all user password based ones

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.