Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
ansible_local provisioning fails with `ubuntu/xenial64` box due to missing synced folder #7463
Comments
|
I guess you're hitting a bug in this As you reported in mitchellh#6740 (comment), the same steps work fine with an other base box ( Can you first please login into the You can also give a try with |
gildegoma
added
guest/ubuntu
provisioner/ansible_local
labels
Jun 16, 2016
gildegoma
self-assigned this
Jun 16, 2016
DmitryRomanenko
commented
Jun 16, 2016
•
|
Yes, it works with
You are right. There is no |
|
Closing as this is problem is specific to the current state of The |
gildegoma
closed this
Jun 17, 2016
gildegoma
added
the
upstream
label
Jun 17, 2016
gildegoma
changed the title from
ansible_local: `playbook` does not exist on the guest: /vagrant/dev.yml
to
ansible_local provisioning fails with `ubuntu/xenial64` box due to missing synced folder
Jun 17, 2016
semiosis
commented
Jun 24, 2016
•
|
FYI for anyone interested, I proposed a fix for ubuntu. You can follow in the launchpad bug. Please upvote the bug if any of these issues in the official Xenial vagrant box affect you:
|
|
Or you could just use the |
semiosis
commented
Sep 7, 2016
|
The latest ubuntu xenial box fixes this problem. |
DmitryRomanenko commentedJun 16, 2016
•
Edited 1 time
-
DmitryRomanenko
Jun 16, 2016
Vagrant version
Vagrant 1.8.4
Host operating system
Windows 10
Guest operating system
Box
ubuntu/xenial64is up to date.That's the latest LTS version of most popular Linux distro.
Vagrantfile
Debug output
https://gist.github.com/DmitryRomanenko/ce4c70a75aa0c782c45f36bc74b9f052
Expected behavior
dev.ymlis executed (nearVagrantfile)Actual behavior
``playbook
does not exist on the guest: /vagrant/dev.ymlSteps to reproduce
dev.ymlwith any content andVagrantfilevagrant upReferences