This should be ContinueExecution. If there's a good way to fix this without breaking things, that would be good. One possibility is adding a correctly spelled constructor which mimics the behavior, but having ContinueExecution and ContinueExectuion do the same thing might be confusing. Maybe do that and mark ContinueExectuion deprecated.
Thanks for the bug report!
Temporarily adding 2 versions of 'continue execution', fixes #10