cabal update should optionally take a server to only update #1656

mxswd opened this Issue Jan 25, 2014 · 0 comments


None yet
2 participants

mxswd commented Jan 25, 2014

A full cabal update is very slow. Ideally, if I have both and a local hackage.local, I should be able to update them independently.

A command such as cabal update hackage.local, where it looks up the server from the name in the remotes.

@ttuegel ttuegel added this to the _|_ milestone Apr 23, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment