From c752db6d204df485060bc9b5d5bcab81f6a03dc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Artem Pelenitsyn Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 14:24:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] manual: fix footnotes: cleanup b5bb050bb --- doc/cabal-package-description-file.rst | 9 ++++----- doc/requirements.in | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/cabal-package-description-file.rst b/doc/cabal-package-description-file.rst index 7359670242d..9ebfe0c9333 100644 --- a/doc/cabal-package-description-file.rst +++ b/doc/cabal-package-description-file.rst @@ -3455,9 +3455,8 @@ a few options: .. rubric:: Footnotes .. [#old-style-build-tool-depends] + Some packages (ab)use :pkg-field:`build-depends` on old-style builds, but this has a few major drawbacks: - Some packages (ab)use :pkg-field:`build-depends` on old-style builds, but this has a few major drawbacks: - - - using Nix-style builds it's considered an error if you depend on a exe-only package via build-depends: the solver will refuse it. - - it may or may not place the executable on ``PATH``. - - it does not ensure the correct version of the package is installed, so you might end up overwriting versions with each other. + - using Nix-style builds it's considered an error if you depend on a exe-only package via build-depends: the solver will refuse it. + - it may or may not place the executable on ``PATH``. + - it does not ensure the correct version of the package is installed, so you might end up overwriting versions with each other. diff --git a/doc/requirements.in b/doc/requirements.in index e2df66c0ef6..f7a6f7143cf 100644 --- a/doc/requirements.in +++ b/doc/requirements.in @@ -15,4 +15,4 @@ idna >= 3.7 # CVE-2024-35195 requests >= 2.32.0 # https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/11246 -docutils <0.18 \ No newline at end of file +docutils <0.18