New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make node types more strict #23

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Dec 3, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@haya14busa
Owner

haya14busa commented Dec 3, 2016

No description provided.

@haya14busa haya14busa changed the title from Make node types more strict & and json arg to Make node types more strict and json arg Dec 3, 2016

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.9%) to 83.345% when pulling 3d907a5a32be77b1d2d16154fbbcec9b97d48e4f on sum-type into 47c0128 on master.

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.9%) to 83.345% when pulling 3d907a5a32be77b1d2d16154fbbcec9b97d48e4f on sum-type into 47c0128 on master.

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.9%) to 83.345% when pulling 3d907a5a32be77b1d2d16154fbbcec9b97d48e4f on sum-type into 47c0128 on master.

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.9%) to 83.345% when pulling 3d907a5a32be77b1d2d16154fbbcec9b97d48e4f on sum-type into 47c0128 on master.

@haya14busa haya14busa changed the title from Make node types more strict and json arg to Make node types more strict Dec 3, 2016

Show outdated Hide outdated go/export.go
Show outdated Hide outdated go/export.go
Show outdated Hide outdated ast/node.go
Show outdated Hide outdated ast/node.go
@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 83.345% when pulling feef606 on sum-type into 84056cc on master.

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 83.345% when pulling feef606 on sum-type into 84056cc on master.

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 83.345% when pulling feef606 on sum-type into 84056cc on master.

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 83.345% when pulling feef606 on sum-type into 84056cc on master.

haya14busa added some commits Dec 3, 2016

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 83.363% when pulling 253f161 on sum-type into 84056cc on master.

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 83.363% when pulling 253f161 on sum-type into 84056cc on master.

@haya14busa haya14busa merged commit f57a807 into master Dec 3, 2016

3 of 4 checks passed

coverage/coveralls Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 83.363%
Details
continuous-integration/drone the build was successful
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details

@haya14busa haya14busa deleted the sum-type branch Dec 3, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment