Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TaskDefinition should be removed from client protocol #9846

Closed
asimarslan opened this issue Feb 9, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@asimarslan
Copy link
Member

commented Feb 9, 2017

com.hazelcast.scheduledexecutor.impl.TaskDefinition is used in serialized form in client protocol. It should blow into fields and put into method definition in protocol.

@asimarslan asimarslan added this to the 3.8 milestone Feb 9, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2017

sancar added a commit to sancar/hazelcast-client-protocol that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2017

asimarslan added a commit to asimarslan/hazelcast that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.