New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create specific properties for isPart relations #39

Closed
acka47 opened this Issue Aug 7, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@acka47
Contributor

acka47 commented Aug 7, 2015

See lobid/lodmill#497 (comment) where it reads:

We should use a level of indirection for the first two as drafted in lobid/lodmill#497 (comment). Thus, we will have to add at least four properties...

@acka47

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@acka47

acka47 Aug 7, 2015

Contributor

Here is the newest suggestion. What do others think?

{
    "@id" : "http://lobid.org/resource/HT017903191",
     "volumeIn" : {
              "multiVolumeWork": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT007384038", 
              "numbering": "10"
     },
     "inSeries" : {
              "series": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT003613090", 
              "numbering": "52"
     }
}
Contributor

acka47 commented Aug 7, 2015

Here is the newest suggestion. What do others think?

{
    "@id" : "http://lobid.org/resource/HT017903191",
     "volumeIn" : {
              "multiVolumeWork": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT007384038", 
              "numbering": "10"
     },
     "inSeries" : {
              "series": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT003613090", 
              "numbering": "52"
     }
}
@acka47

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@acka47

acka47 Aug 7, 2015

Contributor

@literarymachine indicated that a type for the part-to-MutliVolumeWork/Series-relation (as rdfs:range in the vocab and added to lobid data) is needed for editing purposes in edoweb. Considering this, I suggest:

{
    "@id" : "http://lobid.org/resource/HT017903191",
     "volumeIn" : {
             "@type": "http://purl.org/lobid/lv#MultiVolumeWorkRelation",
              "multiVolumeWork": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT007384038", 
              "numbering": "10"
     },
     "inSeries" : {
             "@type": "http://purl.org/lobid/lv#SeriesRelation"
              "series": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT003613090", 
              "numbering": "52"
     }
}

What do you think, @literarymachine ?

Contributor

acka47 commented Aug 7, 2015

@literarymachine indicated that a type for the part-to-MutliVolumeWork/Series-relation (as rdfs:range in the vocab and added to lobid data) is needed for editing purposes in edoweb. Considering this, I suggest:

{
    "@id" : "http://lobid.org/resource/HT017903191",
     "volumeIn" : {
             "@type": "http://purl.org/lobid/lv#MultiVolumeWorkRelation",
              "multiVolumeWork": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT007384038", 
              "numbering": "10"
     },
     "inSeries" : {
             "@type": "http://purl.org/lobid/lv#SeriesRelation"
              "series": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT003613090", 
              "numbering": "52"
     }
}

What do you think, @literarymachine ?

@acka47

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@acka47

acka47 Aug 7, 2015

Contributor

As written in lobid/lodmill#702, for linking articles to a journal or edited volume the property lv:containedIn has to be added.

Contributor

acka47 commented Aug 7, 2015

As written in lobid/lodmill#702, for linking articles to a journal or edited volume the property lv:containedIn has to be added.

@literarymachine

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@literarymachine

literarymachine Aug 7, 2015

Contributor

Seems reasonable! I could also enrich those types internally, but I do believe that a shared vocabulary is the way to go.

Contributor

literarymachine commented Aug 7, 2015

Seems reasonable! I could also enrich those types internally, but I do believe that a shared vocabulary is the way to go.

@dr0i

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dr0i

dr0i Aug 11, 2015

Contributor

+1

Contributor

dr0i commented Aug 11, 2015

+1

@dr0i dr0i assigned acka47 and unassigned dr0i Aug 11, 2015

@acka47 acka47 closed this Aug 11, 2015

@acka47 acka47 removed the review label Aug 11, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment