Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create specific properties for isPart relations #39

Closed
acka47 opened this issue Aug 7, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Create specific properties for isPart relations #39

acka47 opened this issue Aug 7, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor

@acka47 acka47 commented Aug 7, 2015

See lobid/lodmill#497 (comment) where it reads:

We should use a level of indirection for the first two as drafted in lobid/lodmill#497 (comment). Thus, we will have to add at least four properties...

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor Author

@acka47 acka47 commented Aug 7, 2015

Here is the newest suggestion. What do others think?

{
    "@id" : "http://lobid.org/resource/HT017903191",
     "volumeIn" : {
              "multiVolumeWork": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT007384038", 
              "numbering": "10"
     },
     "inSeries" : {
              "series": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT003613090", 
              "numbering": "52"
     }
}
@acka47
Copy link
Contributor Author

@acka47 acka47 commented Aug 7, 2015

@literarymachine indicated that a type for the part-to-MutliVolumeWork/Series-relation (as rdfs:range in the vocab and added to lobid data) is needed for editing purposes in edoweb. Considering this, I suggest:

{
    "@id" : "http://lobid.org/resource/HT017903191",
     "volumeIn" : {
             "@type": "http://purl.org/lobid/lv#MultiVolumeWorkRelation",
              "multiVolumeWork": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT007384038", 
              "numbering": "10"
     },
     "inSeries" : {
             "@type": "http://purl.org/lobid/lv#SeriesRelation"
              "series": "http://lobid.org/resource/HT003613090", 
              "numbering": "52"
     }
}

What do you think, @literarymachine ?

@acka47
Copy link
Contributor Author

@acka47 acka47 commented Aug 7, 2015

As written in lobid/lodmill#702, for linking articles to a journal or edited volume the property lv:containedIn has to be added.

@literarymachine
Copy link
Contributor

@literarymachine literarymachine commented Aug 7, 2015

Seems reasonable! I could also enrich those types internally, but I do believe that a shared vocabulary is the way to go.

@dr0i
Copy link
Contributor

@dr0i dr0i commented Aug 11, 2015

+1

@dr0i dr0i assigned acka47 and unassigned dr0i Aug 11, 2015
@acka47 acka47 closed this Aug 11, 2015
@acka47 acka47 removed the review label Aug 11, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants