Skip to content


Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
Download ZIP
Commits on Jun 23, 2010
Commits on Feb 17, 2010
  1. added documentation tool "docu" to tools (removed it from the gh-page…

    …s branch) and a script that generates the docs
Commits on Jan 10, 2010
Commits on Oct 28, 2009
  1. @nulltoken
Commits on Oct 16, 2009
  1. @dasch

    Ignore test results

    dasch authored
Commits on Sep 10, 2009
  1. @stschake

    Get rid of merge leftovers and edit gitignore

    stschake authored
    Signed-off-by: caytchen <>
Commits on Aug 3, 2009
  1. @mausch


    mausch authored
Commits on Jul 27, 2009
  1. added Gallio project and excluded gallio Reports directory from revis…

    …ion control
    Signed-off-by: henon <>
Commits on Jun 28, 2009
  1. @mausch

    msbuild script, running tests via Gallio

    mausch authored committed
    Signed-off-by: mausch <>
    Signed-off-by: Meinrad Recheis <>
  2. @mausch

    fixed GitTimeToDateTimeOffset test, it failed with different cultures

    mausch authored committed
    Signed-off-by: mausch <>
    Signed-off-by: Meinrad Recheis <>
Commits on Jun 13, 2009
  1. henon entered the plan. i will "fast forward" the development speed

    * Gitty.Core is now a "real" standalone project (git-sharp) and got its own solution.
    * added testgui that can execute the unit tests. cool for debugging!!!
    * ported a lot of unit tests and a lot of code to get them working
    * fixed some errors in the existing ported code
    * ... and had a lot of fun ;)
    Signed-off-by: henon <>
Commits on Apr 2, 2009
  1. @kthompson

    Updated ignore

    kthompson authored
  2. @kthompson

    * Updated namespaces

    kthompson authored
Commits on Dec 3, 2008
  1. 2008-12-02 Miguel de Icaza <>

    Miguel de Icaza authored
    	* Lib/ByteArrayWindow.cs: Implement the functionality for
    	ByteArrayWindow, do not derive from ByteWindow which is a design
    	in the original Java implementation to use two different backends
    	for storage.
    	We could achieve the same in a cleaner way than the original
    	implementation if we choose to do so using an interface.
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.