From 697baf14566bf620f3f833a9aa864b0469170db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Henrik Tidefelt Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:49:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] One more "short class definition" -> "short-class-definition" Addressing comment by Hans: - https://github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/pull/2916#discussion_r611549873 --- chapters/inheritance.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/chapters/inheritance.tex b/chapters/inheritance.tex index 45620d27d..19553850e 100644 --- a/chapters/inheritance.tex +++ b/chapters/inheritance.tex @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ \subsection{Constraining Type}\label{constraining-type} \item The type of the declaration is also used as a constraining type. \item - The modifiers for subsequent redeclarations and constraining type are the modifiers on the component or short class definition if that is used in the original declaration, otherwise empty. + The modifiers for subsequent redeclarations and constraining type are the modifiers on the component or \lstinline[language=grammar]!short-class-definition! if that is used in the original declaration, otherwise empty. \end{itemize} The syntax of a constraining-clause\indexinline{constrainedby} is as follows: