New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify conditional nature of restore in log #1153
Conversation
I'm also not sure if the changelogs file is necessary for fixes like this one. |
Because the solutions take different approaches, I'm happy to defer to whichever approach is most appropriate. My instinct is that the verbiage and placement of the logging I chose fits a bit better, but, again, I'm not certain about it. |
I think the verbiage that's in the other PR is better, but I'm happy to work with you here and proceed with this one. I'll add comments to the diffs. |
I won't be able to finish reviewing this today/tomorrow, so I need to hand it off for now. @skriss can you take point? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daved thank you for making this change! I added some suggestions please. Thank you.
Also, please squash the commits. Thanks!
c6593d9
to
e707e99
Compare
@carlisia |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for making this change @daved! Let's wait for one more 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code LGTM, just one minor request on the changelog
Signed-off-by: Daved <daved@codemodus.com>
e707e99
to
b2b1ee4
Compare
Fixes #1142
I took a shot at this, but am green enough to not have much surety about the change.