Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove shield from isPrivate() #204

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Sep 15, 2020
Merged

remove shield from isPrivate() #204

merged 6 commits into from Sep 15, 2020

Conversation

jdowning
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 15, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 89.655% when pulling 82f6e71 on private-not-shield into 733b77f on main.

Copy link

@subakva subakva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's confusing to have an isPrivate function that gives the wrong answer for shield add-ons. I'm afraid this will be cause more access-related bugs later.

Since the isPrivate function is now only used for checking if zookeeper access should be allowed, can we rename it to isZookeeperAllowed?

I don't want to block this fix, but I think we should change this.

@jdowning jdowning merged commit 7aab16b into main Sep 15, 2020
@jdowning jdowning deleted the private-not-shield branch September 15, 2020 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants